BALY — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of BALY's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-18
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +36 | −62 | ~36 | 34 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 3 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
•unexpected costs and other events impacting our planned construction projects, including a permanent casino resort in Chicago, Illinois (“Bally’s Chicago”) and a full-scale casino and resort in The Bronx, New York (“Bally’s New York”);
Casinos & Resorts - includes 19 land-based casino properties, two horse racetracks and one golf course in the US. For further information on the Casinos & Resorts properties, refer to Note 1 “General Information” to our condensed consolidated financial statements presented in Part I, Item 1 of this …
Bally’s Intralot B2B - includes the global lottery operations of Bally’s Intralot and the Company’s licensing business.
Bally’s Intralot B2C - includes the Company’s interactive European gaming operations, Bally’s Intralot’s B2C lottery operations, as well as one casino property, Bally’s Newcastle, in the UK.
Total revenue for the Successor three months ended June 30, 2026 increased 20% from $657.5 million for the Successor three months ended June 30, 2025. Total revenue for the Successor six months ended June 30, 2026 increased 24% compared to the Predecessor period from January 1, 2025 to February 7, 2…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-18
•unexpected costs and other events impacting our planned construction projects, including Bally’s Chicago;
On February 7, 2025, the Company completed the previously announced transactions under the Agreement and Plan of Merger (as amended, the “Merger Agreement”) with SG Parent LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Parent”), The Queen Casino & Entertainment, Inc., a Delaware corporation and affilia…
On October 8, 2025 (the “Intralot Closing Date”), the Company completed the previously announced acquisition under the transaction agreement (the “Transaction Agreement”) of Intralot, pursuant to which Intralot agreed to acquire Bally’s International Interactive through a combined cash-and-equity tr…
As a result of obtaining a controlling financial interest in Intralot, the Company retained control of Bally’s International Interactive, via Bally’s Holdings Limited, throughout the transaction. On the Intralot Closing Date, legal ownership of Bally’s Holdings Limited transferred from Premier Enter…
For further information on our recent acquisitions, refer to Notes 1 “General Information” and 7 “Business Combinations” to our condensed consolidated financial statements presented in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice