BBLR — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of BBLR's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-21 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-15
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +66 | −89 | ~34 | 10 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +10 | −15 | 0 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +1 | −1 | ~1 | 0 |
| Risk factors | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-21
Bubblr, Inc., doing business as EthicalWeb AI (“EW”), is an artificial intelligence company built on a foundation of patented intellectual property. The Company is entering a phase of anticipated revenue growth driven by its enterprise-focused products, which are designed to capture emerging opportu…
The rapid expansion of generative AI across consumer and enterprise segments underscores how EW’s combination of advanced technical expertise, proprietary intellectual property (“IP”), and agile development practices positions the Company to identify, pursue, and monetize high-value market opportuni…
The rise of generative AI presents substantial opportunities for organizations to increase productivity by automating and streamlining tasks and workflows. While the enterprise generative AI market is in its preliminary stages, adoption of large language model (“LLM”) applications—most notably ChatG…
As a result, many organizations restrict or prohibit the use of generative AI tools due to concerns regarding data leakage beyond their controlled environments. In some cases, these restrictions take the form of blanket bans on external tools based on perceived privacy and security risks. Nonetheles…
EW has identified strong market demand for a solution that enables enterprises to realize the productivity benefits of generative AI while minimizing the operational risks associated with managing and exposing proprietary corporate data. In response, EW has developed and launched AI Vault, an enterp…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
Bubblr, Inc., doing business as EthicalWeb AI (“EW”), is an artificial intelligence company built on a foundation of patented intellectual property.
The Company is entering a significant phase of revenue growth, driven by its enterprise-focused products designed to capture emerging opportunities in the AI and data-driven technology markets.
The rapid expansion of generative AI across consumer and enterprise segments underscores how EW’s combination of advanced technical expertise, proprietary IP, and agile development practices positions the Company to identify, pursue, and monetize high-value market opportunities.
The rise of generative AI presents substantial opportunities for organizations to increase productivity by automating and streamlining tasks and workflows.
While the enterprise generative AI market is still in its early stages, adoption of large language model (“LLM”) applications—most notably ChatGPT—has accelerated rapidly.
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-21
We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (our principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (our principa…
● Lack of Segregation of Duties: We do not maintain sufficient segregation of duties within our accounting functions due to our limited size and resources. Additionally, established oversight protocols and internal controls were not consistently followed or formalized by our Chief Executive Officer.…
● Insufficient Accounting Personnel: We possess insufficient personnel with the requisite expertise in GAAP and SEC reporting requirements, which limits our ability to process, analyze, and timely review complex accounting transactions.
● Lack of Independent Board Oversight: Our Board of Directors lacks a functioning audit committee, a compensation committee, or an outside independent director. This lack of independent oversight limits the effective monitoring and enforcement of our internal controls.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended June 30, 2026, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rule 13a-15(e), promulgated by the SEC pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to …
Management Report of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our CEO and CFO are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. An evaluation was conducted to assess the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. The evaluation was based…
Due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Additionally, projections of effectiveness evaluations in future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate due to changes in conditions…
Based on our evaluation under the criteria outlined in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework, our management concluded that, as of March 31, 2026, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective because of the identification of material weaknesses described as follows:
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-21
We are currently a party to a civil lawsuit pending in the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming (Case No. 1:26-CV-20-ABJ), filed by GHS Investments, LLC, a holder of our preferred stock. The plaintiff seeks the Court’s appointment of a custodian or receiver for Bubblr, Inc. We di…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
We are currently engaged in litigation in the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming. This civil lawsuit was filed by a holder of our preferred stock. The case number of this lawsuit is 1:26-CV-20-ABJ. The plaintiff, GHS Investments, LLC, seeks the Court’s appointment of a custodia…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice