BCO — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of BCO's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-05 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-06
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +58 | −30 | ~46 | 63 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +2 | 0 | ~5 | 25 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
•unfavorable changes in currency exchange rates ($2.6 million),
•organic increases in Rest of World ($13.7 million), Europe ($7.7 million), North America ($7.3 million), and Latin America ($2.1 million) and
•lower costs incurred related to business acquisitions and dispositions ($10.1 million).
Consolidated Income from Continuing Operations Attributable to Brink’s and Related Per Share Amounts Income from continuing operations attributable to Brink’s shareholders increased $0.6 million to $44.5 million due to the lower income tax expense ($6.7 million) and lower noncontrolling interest ($0…
Consolidated Revenues Revenues increased $220.2 million due to the favorable impact of currency exchange rates ($108.5 million), organic increases in Rest of World ($42.0 million), North America ($30.7 million), Europe ($18.6 million), and Latin America ($18.3 million), and the favorable impact of a…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
•organic increases in North America ($7.8 million), Europe ($7.6 million), Rest of World ($6.0 million), and Latin America ($0.9 million) and
•favorable changes in currency exchange rates ($6.7 million), driven primarily by the Mexican peso, the euro, and Brazilian real.
Consolidated Income from Continuing Operations Attributable to Brink’s and Related Per Share Amounts Income from continuing operations attributable to Brink’s shareholders decreased $19.5 million to $32.1 million due to the decrease in operating profit mentioned above, lower interest and other nonop…
Non-GAAP Financial Measures The non-GAAP measures included in the table above and the analysis below present our operating profit, operating profit margin, income from continuing operations and earnings per share without certain income and expense items that do not reflect the regular earnings of th…
Non-GAAP Consolidated Operating Profit and Non-GAAP Operating Profit Margin Non-GAAP operating profit margin increased from 12.1% to 12.2%. Non-GAAP operating profit increased $17.8 million due mainly to:
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
•risks related to changes in control over, or economic interests in, foreign subsidiaries, including the resulting accounting, financial reporting, and operational impacts;
•the impact of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and other changes in tax laws, regulations and interpretations;
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice