BLTH — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of BLTH's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-10 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-15
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +7 | −1 | ~13 | 16 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +1 | 0 | ~2 | 5 |
| Risk factors | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Legal proceedings, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-10
Six months ended June 30, 2026, Compared to Six months ended June 30, 2025.
For the six months ended June 30, 2026, and 2025, our company had no revenue.
General and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2026, were $1,097,901, a decrease of $118,153 or 10%, compared to $1,216,054 for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease in operating expenses was mainly due to a decrease in wages and related expenses.
During the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, our company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $1,045,346 and $565,453, respectively.
During the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, the Company recorded a fair value of stock issued for note modification of $2,572,517 and $410,008, respectively.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
We require cash to fund our operating expenses and working capital requirements, including outlays for capital expenditures. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis. Our company had a net loss of $4,227,409 during the three months ended March 31…
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-10
We did not maintain effective controls over the identification and accounting for complex and non-routine transactions. Accordingly, we believe we have a material weakness because there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement to the interim or annual consolidated financial statement…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice