BOBS — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of BOBS's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-07
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +49 | −27 | ~26 | 28 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Risk factors | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
•amending our Asset Based Revolving Credit Facility (“Revolving Credit Facility”) increasing the maximum availability from $125.0 million to $200.0 million and extending the maturity date to April 2031;
•opening four new stores and expanding our footprint into South Carolina, our 27th state; and
In early 2025, the U.S. Government began imposing significant new or increased tariffs on goods imported into the U.S. from numerous countries from which the Company sources merchandise. The global trade environment remains fluid and highly uncertain in 2026. The U.S. Government imposes a 25% tariff…
In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that many of the tariffs recently imposed by the U.S. Government exceeded its statutory authority, thereby invalidating many, but not all, of such tariffs. The U.S. presidential administration has indicated that it may seek to reinstate all or a portion…
International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”) tariff refund claims. Of this amount, we recognized $37.9 million of tariff refund claims related to inventory previously sold, which reduced costs of sales and favorably impacted gross profit for the period. Additionally, we recognized $1.5 mill…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
•completing an initial public offering (“IPO”) in which 19,450,000 shares of common stock were sold at a price of $17.00 per share resulting in aggregate net proceeds of $304.2 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses;
•opening five new stores and a Midwest regional distribution center; and
In early 2025, the U.S. Government began imposing significant new or increased tariffs on goods imported into the U.S. from numerous countries from which the Company sources merchandise. The global trade environment remains fluid and highly uncertain in 2026. The U.S. Government imposed a 25% tariff…
asset related to any potential refund. The Company will recognize any recovery as a reduction to cost of sales or inventory as applicable in the period in which recovery becomes realized or realizable. In April 2026, the President issued a proclamation that reduced the tariff rate on steel and alumi…
Since late February 2026, the conflict in Iran has resulted in heightened volatility in fuel prices and geopolitical uncertainty. Geopolitical events, increased fuel prices and geopolitical uncertainty, including changes in U.S. tariff policy, has in the past resulted in supply chain disruptions, in…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice