BRGX — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of BRGX's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-20 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-14
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +12 | −16 | ~14 | 15 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~7 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-20
The Company has generated recurring losses from operations and cash flow deficits from its operations since inception and has had to raise funds through equity offerings or borrowings to continue operating. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going conc…
The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain necessary debt or equity financing to continue operations until it begins generating positive cash flow. No assurance can be given that any future financing will be available or, if available, that it will be …
For the three months ended March 31, 2026, the Company had net loss of $(26,415). During that period, the Company incurred depreciation and amortization expense of $12,943,issued fair value of options issued to officers and directors for services of $6,782, issued common shares for services with a f…
Comparatively, for the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Company had net loss of $(266,854). During that period, the Company incurred depreciation and amortization expense of $12,377, amortization of debt discount of $1,515, issued common shares for services with a fair value of $75,633, issued…
For the three months ended March 31, 2026 and March 31, 2025, the Company did not pursue any investing activities.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-14
2024 $ Variance Favorable/ (Unfavorable) % Variance Favorable/ (Unfavorable)
For the nine months ended September 30, 2025, the Company had gross sales of $1,472,806 and returns of $(3,934) resulting in net sales of $1,468,872. Comparatively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, the Company had gross sales of $2,138,933 and returns of $(259,376) resulting in net sale…
Cost of sales were $283,989 resulting in gross profit of $1,184,883 for the nine months ended September 30, 2025. Cost of sales were $543,933 resulting in gross profit of $1,335,684 for the nine months ended September 30, 2024. Cost of goods sold decreased by 48% and gross profit decreased by11% for…
For the nine months ended September 30, 2025, the Company paid out distributors’ incentives of $13,581 and other selling, general and administrative expenses of $1,479,635 resulting in total operating expenses of $1,493,216. These selling, general and administrative expenses consisted primarily of e…
Comparatively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, the Company paid out distributors’ incentives of $177,833, recorded $1,621,948 in amortization expense and other selling, general and administrative expenses of $3,982,443 resulting in total operating expenses of $5,782,224. The other sell…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice