BSRR — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of BSRR's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-07-31 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-01
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +66 | −57 | ~41 | 66 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | −1 | ~2 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-31
respectively, for the same quarter in 2025. The primary drivers behind the variance in second quarter net income are as follows:
●A $1.1 million increase in credit loss expense on loans, resulting primarily from a $2.5 million specific reserve on a single agricultural production loan to a borrower in the lumber industry.
●Net interest income remained stable, decreasing $0.2 million, while noninterest income increased slightly and noninterest expense decreased by $0.3 million.
●Noninterest income and noninterest expense changes included a $0.4 million increase in earnings from separate account life insurance and a $0.1 million increase in deferred compensation expense. Separate account life insurance income and deferred compensation expense are designed to offset each oth…
●Noninterest expense in the second quarter of 2026 included approximately $0.5 million of severance and recruitment related charges resulting from a restructuring of the executive team.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-01
return on average assets was 1.39% for the quarter March 31, 2026, compared to 10.44% and 1.02%, respectively, for the same quarter in 2025. The primary drivers behind the variance in first quarter net income are as follows:
●Net income for the first quarter of 2026 increased $3.4 million, or 38%, to $12.5 million. There were favorable changes in every major income statement category, including a decrease in provision for credit losses of $2.0 million, or 99%, an increase in net interest income of $0.5 million, or 2%, a…
●The $0.5 million increase in net interest income was due to a $0.8 million decrease in interest expense partially offset by a $0.3 million decrease in interest income.
●The decrease of $2.0 million in the provision for credit losses was primarily due to an increased specific reserve in the first quarter of 2025 on an individually evaluated loan related to a single loan relationship of a wine grape grower.
●The $1.3 million increase in noninterest income was primarily due to higher service charge income, an increase in cash surrender value of life insurance due to purchases of additional life insurance in the second quarter of 2025, and other increases related to higher FHLB dividend income and an inc…
Controls & procedures
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-01
and its consolidated subsidiaries would be made known to them by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report was being prepared.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice