CACI — what changed in the latest 10-K
A section-by-section comparison of CACI's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-K · 2026-08-06 vs the prior 10-K · 2025-08-07
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business | Text added/removed | +6 | −6 | ~17 | 23 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | +47 | −36 | ~20 | 61 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +5 | −2 | ~2 | 21 |
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +31 | −27 | ~15 | 29 |
| Market risk (Item 7A) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
Business
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-K · 2026-08-06
•Technology – CACI provides technology that addresses our customers’ most challenging needs. This includes agile software development using open modern architectures and DevSecOps; advanced data platforms, applications, and analytics augmented by Artificial Intelligence (AI), Enterprise Resource Pla…
Our proven Technology and Expertise and strong record of program delivery have enabled us to compete for and secure new customers and contracts, win repeat business, and build and maintain long-term customer relationships. We seek competitive business opportunities and have built our operations to s…
Our customers are primarily agencies and departments of the U.S. government as well as foreign governments and commercial enterprises. The demand for our Technology and Expertise is largely driven by the evolving national security and geopolitical environment, the increasingly complex network, syste…
For additional discussion and analysis on recent business developments, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We provide our Technology and Expertise to our domestic customers in the following market areas:
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-K · 2025-08-07
•Technology – CACI provides technology that addresses our customers' most challenging needs. This includes agile software development using open modern architectures and DevSecOps; advanced data platforms and applications augmented by Artificial Intelligence (AI), Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) …
Our proven Expertise and Technology and strong record of program delivery have enabled us to compete for and secure new customers and contracts, win repeat business, and build and maintain long-term customer relationships. We seek competitive business opportunities and have built our operations to s…
Our customers are primarily agencies and departments of the U.S. government as well as foreign governments and commercial enterprises. The demand for our Expertise and Technology is largely driven by the evolving national security and geopolitical environment, the increasingly complex network, syste…
For additional discussion and analysis on recent business developments, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition & Results of Operations” in Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We provide our Expertise and Technology to our domestic customers in the following market areas:
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-K · 2026-08-06
Because we derive substantially all of our revenues from contracts with the federal government, the success and development of our business will continue to depend on our successful participation in federal government contract programs. Actions taken by the federal government to address government b…
Additionally, the federal government may also change its budgeting in response to evolving national security, technology, economic, or policy considerations. A significant decline in expenditures for programs in our addressable markets, or a reallocation of funds toward missions or capabilities we d…
For further discussion, refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Federal government contracts contain termination rights and numerous other provisions that are unfavorable to us.
If the government terminates a contract for convenience, we may recover only our incurred or committed costs, settlement expenses, and profit on work completed prior to the termination. If the government terminates a contract for default, we may be unable to recover even those amounts and instead ma…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-K · 2025-08-07
Our business could be adversely affected by delays caused by our competitors protesting major contract awards received by us, resulting in the delay of the initiation of work.
The number of bid protests of contract awards by unsuccessful bidders is increasing and the U.S. government is taking longer to resolve such protests. Bid protests may result in an increase in expenses related to obtaining contract awards or an unfavorable modification or loss of an award. In the ev…
Because we derive substantially all of our revenues from contracts with the federal government, we believe that the success and development of our business will continue to depend on our successful participation in federal government contract programs. Changes in federal government budgetary priorit…
At times, we may continue to work without funding, and use our own internal funds in order to meet our customers' desired delivery dates for Expertise or Technology. It is uncertain at this time which of our programs’ funding could be reduced in future years or whether new legislation will be passed…
Additionally, our business could be affected if we experience an increase in set-asides for small businesses that could result in our inability to compete directly for prime contracts.
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-K · 2026-08-06
On September 10, 2021, the Court conducted a hearing on CACI’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and took the motion under advisement.
The Court issued an Order directing the plaintiffs to provide the Court with a calculation of specific damages sought by each plaintiff. In response, plaintiffs advised the Court that, if the case is tried, they do not intend to request a specific amount of damages.
On November 25, 2024, CACI filed a motion for judgment as a matter of law, asserting numerous grounds for setting aside the jury verdict and dismissing the action. On January 10, 2025, the District Court conducted a hearing on that motion and denied the motion. On January 10, 2025, CACI filed a Noti…
On June 29, 2026, the Court of Appeals directed the parties to file supplemental briefs addressing their views on the effect of the Cisco decision. The parties subsequently filed briefs as directed. The matter is pending before the Court of Appeals.
On July 9, 2026, CACI filed a motion to lift the stay so that CACI could file a motion to dismiss based on the Cisco decision noted above. The District Court denied that motion without prejudice, noting that the Court of Appeals had not yet determined Cisco’s effect on the Al Shimari action.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-K · 2025-08-07
On September 10, 2021, the Court conducted a hearing on CACI’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and took the motion under advisement. The Court issued an Order directing the plaintiffs to provide the Court with a calculation of specific damages sought by each plaintiff. In r…
On November 25, 2024, CACI filed a motion for judgment as a matter of law, asserting numerous grounds for setting aside the jury verdict and dismissing the action. On January 10, 2025, the District Court conducted a hearing on that motion and denied the motion. On January 10, 2025, CACI filed a Noti…
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-K · 2026-08-06
While we view the current budget environment as constructive, the timing and passage of annual appropriations remain uncertain in any given government fiscal year (GFY). During periods when Congress has not enacted full-year appropriations, federal agencies operate under a CR. A CR typically authori…
The scope and duration of CRs can negatively affect our business by delaying new programs, contract awards, or other customer decisions. If a CR expires without the enactment of full-year appropriations or an extension via a new CR, the federal government must cease non-essential operations (a “gove…
On May 2, 2025, the President submitted the GFY26 Presidential Budget Request (PBR), which proposed holding defense spending at the GFY25 enacted (full-year CR) level of $893 billion. On July 4, 2025, the President signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), a reconciliation bill providing additi…
On October 1, 2025, the federal government entered a shutdown. On November 12, 2025, the President signed a CR that ended the shutdown and restored government operations, extending funding for most agencies at GFY25 levels through January 30, 2026. Following the expiration of that CR, a partial shut…
On February 14, 2026, the temporary funding for DHS expired, and the department entered a shutdown. Portions of DHS operations continued due to the availability of mandatory OBBBA funding. On April 30, 2026, Congress passed full-year GFY26 funding for DHS, excluding funding for Immigration and Custo…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-K · 2025-08-07
While we view the budget environment as constructive and believe there is bipartisan support for continued investment in the areas of defense and national security, it is uncertain when (and if) in any particular government fiscal year (GFY) that appropriations bills will be passed. During those per…
Depending on their scope, duration, and other factors, CRs can negatively impact our business due to delays in new program starts, delays in contract award decisions, and other factors. When a CR expires, unless appropriations bills have been passed by Congress and signed by the President, or a new …
On May 2, 2025, President Trump submitted the GFY26 Presidential Budget Request (PBR) to Congress, which held defense spending at the GFY25 enacted level (a full-year CR) of $893 billion. On July 4, 2025, President Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), which provides additional fundin…
We provide Expertise and Technology to government customers. We believe that the total addressable market for our offerings is sufficient to support the Company's plans and is expected to continue to grow over the next several years. Approximately 75% of our revenue comes from defense-related custom…
We continue to align the Company’s capabilities with well-funded budget priorities and take steps to maintain a competitive cost structure in line with our expectations of future business opportunities. In light of these actions, as well as the budgetary environment discussed above, we believe we ar…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice