CHPT — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of CHPT's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-09-04 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-06-08
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +21 | −11 | ~29 | 41 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 2 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Risk factors | Some risk factors updated | +20 | −21 | ~45 | 305 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-09-04
Percentage of Networked Charging Systems revenue84.7 %92.8 %
Cost of Networked Charging Systems revenue increased during the three and six months ended July 31, 2026 compared to the three and six months ended July 31, 2025 primarily due to a higher volume of products shipped, partially offset by a one-time tariff refund during the three and six months ended J…
Cost of Subscriptions revenue increased primarily due to the increases in Assure costs during the three and six months ended July 31, 2026 compared to the three and six months ended July 31, 2025.
Cost of other revenue did not materially change during the three and six months ended July 31, 2026 compared to the three and six months ended July 31, 2025.
Research and development expenses decreased during the three months ended July 31, 2026 compared to the three months ended July 31, 2025 primarily due to a decrease of $6.3 million in payroll-related expense resulting from reduced headcount associated with our previously announced reorganizations, i…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-06-08
Cost of Networked Charging Systems revenue increased during the three months ended April 30, 2026 compared to the three months ended April 30, 2025 primarily due to lower costs of products shipped.
Cost of Subscriptions revenue increased primarily due to the increases in Assure costs during the three months ended April 30, 2026 compared to the three months ended April 30, 2025.
Cost of other revenue decreased during the three months ended April 30, 2026 compared to the three months ended April 30, 2025 due to cost efficiencies associated with driver charging sessions at charging sites owned by ChargePoint’s customers.
Research and development expenses increased during the three months ended April 30, 2026 compared to the three months ended April 30, 2025 primarily due to $4.1 million employee severance, termination and employment-related exit costs related to the March 2026 Reorganization, offset by a $3.2 millio…
Sales and marketing expenses decreased during the three months ended April 30, 2026 compared to the three months ended April 30, 2025 primarily due to a decrease in bad debt expense of $2.0 million, decrease of $1.2 million in stock based compensation, offset by $1.7 million employee severance, term…
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-09-04
In addition, the emerging development and deployment of autonomous vehicle fleets may present distinct challenges to ChargePoint. Autonomous fleet operators have charging requirements that differ materially from those of traditional fleet operators, including the need for high-throughput, and depot-…
ChargePoint’s headquarters are located in the San Francisco Bay Area in an area projected to be vulnerable to future water scarcity and sea level rise due to climate change as well as in an active earthquake zone. The occurrence of a natural disaster such as an earthquake, drought, flood, fire (such…
failure to establish such sustainability targets or targets that are perceived to be appropriate, as well as to achieve progress on those targets on a timely basis, or at all, could adversely affect the reputation of its brand and sales of and demand for its products.
ChargePoint also derives other revenue, as set forth on its condensed consolidated statements of operations, from regulatory credits, such as from the Canadian Clean Fuel Regulation (“CCFR”). If government support of these credits declines, or if the requirements of such programs are modified or tig…
EV market. If any of the above influence consumers or businesses to no longer purchase EVs or purchase them at a lower rate, it would materially and adversely affect ChargePoint’s business, operating results, financial condition and prospects.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-06-08
ChargePoint’s headquarters are located in the San Francisco Bay Area in an area projected to be vulnerable to future water scarcity and sea level rise due to climate change as well as in an active earthquake zone. The occurrence of a natural
disaster such as an earthquake, drought, flood, fire (such as the increasingly frequent wildfires in California), localized extended outages of critical utilities (such as California’s public safety power shut-offs) or transportation systems, or any critical resource shortages could cause a signific…
ChargePoint also derives other revenue as set forth on its condensed consolidated statements of operations from regulatory credits. If government support of these credits declines, ChargePoint’s ability to generate this other revenue in the future would be adversely affected. In years prior to fisca…
intellectual property could result in competitors offering similar products, potentially resulting in the loss of some of ChargePoint’s competitive advantage and a decrease in revenue which would adversely affect its business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.
may have the ability to dedicate substantially greater resources to enforce their intellectual property rights than ChargePoint does. Accordingly, ChargePoint may not be able to prevent third-parties from infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating its intellectual property. Any of the foreg…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice