CLAR — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of CLAR's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-07
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +33 | −13 | ~17 | 15 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +4 | −4 | ~4 | 12 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
On July 1, 2021, the Company completed the acquisition of Australia-based Rhino-Rack Holdings Pty Ltd (“Rhino-Rack”). On December 1, 2021, the Company completed the acquisition of Australia-based MaxTrax Australia Pty Ltd
Sales in the Outdoor segment increased due to increases in global wholesale revenue of $2,709, independent global distributor revenue of $372, and global direct-to-consumer revenue of $228, partially offset by lower PIEPS revenue of $195 due to the sale of PIEPS in July 2025, compared to the prior p…
Cost of goods sold decreased $6,883, or 19.4%, to $28,684 during the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to cost of goods sold of $35,567 during the three months ended June 30, 2025. During the three months ended June 30, 2026, the Outdoor segment received IEEPA tariff refunds of $6,142 which…
Selling, general, and administrative expenses decreased $2,607, or 9.7%, to $24,303 during the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to selling, general and administrative expenses of $26,910 during the three months ended June 30, 2025. Selling, general and administrative expenses at the Advent…
Contingent consideration benefit increased to $254 during the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to a contingent consideration benefit of $0 during the three months ended June 30, 2025, which consisted of changes in the estimated fair value of contingent consideration liabilities associated …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
On August 21, 2017, the Company acquired Sierra Bullets, L.L.C. (“Sierra”). On October 2, 2020, the Company completed the acquisition of certain assets and liabilities constituting the Barnes business (“Barnes”). On July 1, 2021, the Company completed the acquisition of Australia-based Rhino-Rack Ho…
On February 29, 2024, the Company completed the sale of all of the equity associated with the Company’s Precision Sport segment, which was comprised of the Company’s subsidiaries Sierra Bullets, L.L.C. (“Sierra”) and Barnes Bullets – Mona, LLC (“Barnes”), pursuant to a Purchase and Sale Agreement da…
Sales in the Adventure segment increased due to a favorable wholesale market in Australia for Rhino-Rack and MAXTRAX, partially offset by decreases in North America. Sales in the Outdoor segment increased due to increases in global wholesale revenue of $2,936 and independent global distributor reven…
Cost of goods sold decreased $464, or 1.2%, to $39,175 during the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to cost of goods sold of $39,639 during the three months ended March 31, 2025.
Selling, general, and administrative expenses decreased $39, or 0.1%, to $26,577 during the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to selling, general and administrative expenses of $26,616 during the three months ended March 31, 2025. Selling, general and administrative expenses at the Adventu…
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
Protection Safety Act and related regulations regarding certain models of avalanche transceivers switching unexpectedly out of “send” mode.
On June 4, 2026, the Company received a letter from the DOJ advising that based on information presently known to the government and the principles of federal prosecution, the DOJ has closed this investigation as to the Company and BDEL. On the same date, Messrs. Walbrecht and Vance received similar…
had closed the investigation as to them. The Company has not received any further correspondence from the CPSC relating to the above matters.
On March 13, 2025, the Company received a letter from the CPSC requesting various categories of documents and information in connection with an investigation into whether BDEL sold products that were subject to a recall. The Company has cooperated with that investigation, substantially completed doc…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
with BDEL in March 2021. BDEL received a letter from the CPSC, dated October 28, 2021, stating that the CPSC is investigating whether BDEL has timely complied with the reporting requirements of Section 15(b) of the Consumer Protection Safety Act and related regulations regarding certain models of av…
On March 13, 2025, the Company received a letter from the CPSC requesting various categories of documents and information in connection with an investigation into whether BDEL sold products that were subject to a recall. The
Company has cooperated with that investigation, substantially completed document production, and delivered a narrative explanatory letter to the CPSC on June 18, 2025. On January 28, 2026, the CPSC closed its investigation into this specific matter without taking further action.
Based on currently available information, the Company believes an unfavorable outcome with the CPSC is probable, however, we cannot reasonably estimate on what terms this matter will be resolved with the CPSC or the U.S. Department of Justice. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company rec…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice