CLSKWvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of CLSKW against SIC 6199 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| 기업 | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSKW본 종목 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DFDV | $141M#1 | — | — | 12.4x#1 | 442.2%#1 | -2605.8%#4 | -319.7%#1 | — | -34.1%#2 | — | — | — |
| AGPU | $128M#2 | — | 3.7x#5 | 1017.7x#5 | 47.7%#3 | -1740.6%#3 | -144404.5%#5 | -684.7%#5 | -1068.3%#5 | 4#1 | — | — |
| ZSQR | $121M#3 | — | 0.9x#3 | 88.8x#4 | — | -11.6%#1 | -956.9%#2 | -9.0%#2 | -11.1%#1 | — | — | — |
| FGNXP | $119M#4 | — | 1.9x#4 | 49.4x#2 | 209.8%#2 | -4975.4%#5 | -2652.3%#3 | -104.1%#3 | -155.3%#4 | — | — | — |
| EMPD | $86M#5 | 1.2x#1 | 0.8x#2 | 88.5x#3 | -75.5%#4 | -229.7%#2 | -15742.0%#4 | -132.3%#4 | -93.2%#3 | — | — | — |
| BRRWW | $32M#6 | — | 0.1x#1 | — | — | — | — | 0.0%#1 | — | — | — | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 6199). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. 이 표는 생성 중 시간이 초과되어 그룹의 일부만 포함합니다. 순위는 표시된 행 내에서만 유효하며 곧 채워집니다. Table built 2026-09-17.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice