CPSS — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of CPSS's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-07 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-08
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +42 | −18 | ~26 | 36 |
| Controls & procedures | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 7 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3)
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-07
Generally, prior to a securitization transaction we fund our automobile contract purchases primarily with proceeds from warehouse credit facilities. As of June 30, 2026 our short-term funding capacity was $725.0 million over two credit facilities. The first credit facility was established in May 201…
In October 2025, we entered into a new $167.5 million facility. On April 3, 2026, it amended its two-year revolving credit agreement with Capital One, N.A. to increase the capacity of the facility. The amendment applies to both Capital One, N.A. and the subordinate lender, and increases the capacity…
Interest Earning Assets Balance Interest Yield Balance Interest Yield
Other income was $3.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $1.4 million for the comparable period in 2025. This $1.9 million increase was primarily driven by the dealer recoveries collected for the three months ending June 30, 2026. These dealer recoveries were $1.8 million …
Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2026, was $64.3 million and represented 57.2% of total operating expenses, compared to $58.7 million in the previous year, when it was 57.1% of total operating expenses. The $5.5 million increase in interest expense compared to the prior year peri…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
Generally, prior to a securitization transaction we fund our automobile contract purchases primarily with proceeds from warehouse credit facilities. We currently have short-term funding capacity of $702.5 million over three credit facilities. The first credit facility was established in May 2012. Th…
In November 2015, we entered into a $100 million facility with Ares Agent Services, L.P. In June 2022, we increased the capacity of our credit agreement from $100 million to $200 million. This facility was most recently renewed in March 2024, extending the revolving period to March 2026, followed by…
In October 2025, we entered into a new $167.5 million facility. This facility has a two year revolving period to October 2027, with an optional amortization period through April 2029.
Other income was $3.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to $1.4 million for the comparable period in 2025. This $2.2 million increase was primarily driven by the dealer recoveries collected for the three months ending March 31, 2026. These dealer recoveries were $2.3 millio…
Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2026, was $60.1 million and represented 57.6% of total operating expenses, compared to $54.9 million in the previous year, when it was 54.9% of total operating expenses.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice