CRAQ — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of CRAQ's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-17 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-15
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +4 | −2 | ~10 | 9 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 2 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Legal proceedings, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-17
For the six months ended June 30, 2026, we had a net income $3,643,470, which consisted of earnings on investments held in Trust Account of $4,143,176 and interest from the operating bank account of $15,551 offset by general and administrative expenses of $515,257.
For the three months ended June 30, 2025, we had a net income $599,557, which consisted of earnings on investments held in Trust Account of $868,152 and interest from operating bank account of $5,084 offset by compensation expense of $132,300, bank service fees of $5,000, and general and administrat…
For the period from January 7, 2025 (inception) through June 30, 2025, we had a net income $556,735, which consisted of earnings on investments held in Trust Account of $868,152 and interest income from bank operating account of $5,084 offset by compensation expense of $132,300, bank service fees of…
In connection with the Company’s assessment of going concern considerations in accordance with ASC Topic 205-40, “Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern,” the Company does not believe it will need to raise additional funds in order to meet the expenditures required for operating its busi…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
For the period from January 7, 2025 (inception) through March 31, 2025, we had a net loss $42,822, which consisted of general and administrative costs.
We do not believe we will need to raise additional funds in order to meet the expenditures required for operating our business. However, if our estimate of the costs of identifying a target business, undertaking in-depth due diligence and negotiating a business combination are less than the actual a…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice