CSR — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of CSR's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-03 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-04
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +57 | −36 | ~22 | 53 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-03
•the ability of the Company to complete its proposed dispositions on a timely basis, or at all;
•risks that the Company’s recently completed or proposed dispositions disrupt current plans and operations;
•the anticipated costs related to the Company’s recently completed and proposed dispositions;
•the ability of the Company to realize the anticipated benefits of its recently completed and proposed dispositions and the intended use of proceeds therefrom, as well as the Company’s strategic review;
•Disposed of an apartment community consisting of 176 homes in Denver, Colorado for an aggregate sales price of $30.0 million.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-04
•the process and results of our review of strategic alternatives;
•For the three months ended March 31, 2026, revenue decreased by $2.0 million or 3.0% to $65.1 million, compared to $67.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, primarily due to the sale of 12 apartment communities in the prior year, offset by increased revenue from non-same-store commun…
•Same-store revenues remained consistent year over year, while property operating expenses increased, driving a 1.1% decrease in same-store NOI compared to the same period of the prior year.
•Net loss was $0.77 per diluted share for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to net loss of $0.22 per diluted share for the same period of the prior year.
•Non-GAAP Core Funds from Operations (“Core FFO”) per diluted share decreased to $1.12 for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to $1.21 for the three months ended March 31, 2025. See the description of Core FFO on pages 25 and 26 and the reconciliation of net loss available to common sha…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice