CSR — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of CSR's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-04 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-03
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +52 | −76 | ~19 | 40 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 2 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-04
•adverse changes in our markets, including future demand for apartment homes in those markets, barriers of entry into new markets, limitations on our ability to increase rental rates, our ability to identify and consummate attractive acquisitions and dispositions on favorable terms, our ability to r…
•the process and results of our review of strategic alternatives;
New factors may also arise from time to time that could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The foregoing review of factors…
•For the three months ended March 31, 2026, revenue decreased by $2.0 million or 3.0% to $65.1 million, compared to $67.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, primarily due to the sale of 12 apartment communities in the prior year, offset by increased revenue from non-same-store commun…
•Same-store revenues remained consistent year over year, while property operating expenses increased, driving a 1.1% decrease in same-store NOI compared to the same period of the prior year.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-03
New factors may also arise from time to time that could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Except as otherwise required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events, circumstances, or changes in expect…
•Acquired Railway Flats in Loveland, Colorado, consisting of 420 homes for an aggregate purchase price of $132.2 million, which includes the assumption of $76.5 million in mortgage debt.
•Sold five apartment communities in St. Cloud, Minnesota for an aggregate sale price of $124.0 million.
•For the three months ended September 30, 2025, revenue increased by $6.4 million or 9.8% to $71.4 million, compared to $65.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2024, primarily due to increased revenue from same-store and non-same-store communities.
•Same-store revenues increased by 2.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2025, compared to the same period of the prior year, driving a 4.5% increase in same-store NOI compared to the same period of the prior year.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice