CTA.PB — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of CTA.PB's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-07-31 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-06
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +64 | −46 | ~18 | 36 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~4 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 16 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-31
On November 5, 2023, management of the company approved a plan to further optimize its Crop Protection network of manufacturing and external partners (the "Crop Protection Operations Strategy Restructuring Program"). On June 12, 2026, the company disclosed that its management recently committed to t…
The following is a summary of results from continuing operations for the three months ended June 30, 2026:
•The company reported net sales of $6,379 million, down 1 percent versus the same quarter last year, reflecting a 3 percent decrease in volume, partially offset by a 1 percent increase in price and a 1 percent favorable impact from currency.
•Cost of goods sold totaled $2,718 million in the second quarter of 2026, down from $2,932 million in the second quarter of 2025, which was driven by ongoing cost and productivity actions, a reduction in net royalty expense and lower volumes.
•Restructuring and asset related charges - net were $49 million in the second quarter of 2026, a decrease from $79 million in the second quarter of 2025. The charges for the three months ended June 30, 2026 were primarily comprised of severance and related benefit costs, asset related charges, decom…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
The company expects to incur aggregate pre‑tax restructuring and asset‑related charges of approximately $70 million to $80 million in connection with the 2026 Restructuring Actions, consisting solely of severance and related benefit costs. Reductions in workforce are subject to local regulatory requ…
The following is a summary of results from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026:
•The company reported net sales of $4,905 million, up 11 percent versus the same quarter last year, reflecting a 6 percent increase in volume, a 4 percent favorable impact from currency and a 1 percent increase in price.
•Cost of goods sold totaled $2,372 million in the first quarter of 2026, up from $2,342 million in the first quarter of 2025, which was driven by volume growth, with a partial offset from net cost and productivity benefits and net royalty improvement.
•Restructuring and asset related charges - net were $92 million in the first quarter of 2026, an increase from $22 million in the first quarter of 2025. The charges for the three months ended March 31, 2026 were primarily comprised of severance and related benefit costs associated with the 2026 Rest…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice