CURLFvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of CURLF against SIC 2833 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| 기업 | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CURLF본 종목 | — | — | — | — | -5.0%#4 | -7.3%#3 | 2.0%#2 | -26.6%#5 | 1.8%#1 | — | — | — |
| CHUC | — | — | — | — | 169.4%#1 | 208.2%#1 | -10.4%#4 | 143.5%#1 | -21.1%#3 | 5#1 | — | — |
| CRON | $1.2B#2 | 17.5x#1 | 1.1x#1 | 8.4x#2 | 24.6%#2 | -107.3%#6 | -11.9%#5 | -0.3%#2 | — | — | — | — |
| CWLXF | — | — | — | — | 8.3%#3 | 18.3%#2 | 7.0%#1 | -12.8%#3 | — | — | — | — |
| DFTX | $5.3B#1 | — | 5.7x#2 | — | — | -69.1%#5 | — | -20.0%#4 | -55.5%#4 | — | — | — |
| GLAS | $649M#3 | — | 8.8x#3 | 3.6x#1 | -9.4%#5 | -5814.6%#7 | -9.1%#3 | -40.1%#6 | -13.9%#2 | — | — | — |
| GLUC | — | — | — | — | — | -54.3%#4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 2833). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. 이 표는 생성 중 시간이 초과되어 그룹의 일부만 포함합니다. 순위는 표시된 행 내에서만 유효하며 곧 채워집니다. Table built 2026-09-22.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice