CVMvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of CVM against SIC 2836 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| 기업 | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVM본 종목 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BKHA | $49M#1 | — | — | — | — | -30.6%#5 | — | — | — | — | — | 104.1%#1 |
| SCLX | $47M#2 | — | — | 1.5x#1 | -46.5%#2 | -413.8%#7 | -1143.7%#2 | — | — | 4#1 | — | — |
| MGX | $43M#3 | — | 0.4x#1 | 1.7x#2 | -51.8%#3 | -12.6%#3 | -380.9%#1 | -78.1%#2 | — | — | -40.3%#1 | — |
| ATYR | $37M#4 | — | 0.8x#2 | 193.2x#3 | -19.1%#1 | -15.8%#4 | -40856.3%#3 | -151.9%#3 | -202.0%#1 | — | — | — |
| QNCX | $28M#5 | 0.2x#1 | — | — | — | -47.8%#6 | — | — | — | — | -91.4%#2 | — |
| JSPR | $21M#6 | — | 14.8x#4 | — | — | 100.0%#1 | — | -0.0%#1 | — | — | — | — |
| PASG | $15M#7 | — | 3.4x#3 | — | — | 29.7%#2 | — | -1021.6%#4 | — | — | — | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 2836). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. 이 표는 생성 중 시간이 초과되어 그룹의 일부만 포함합니다. 순위는 표시된 행 내에서만 유효하며 곧 채워집니다. Table built 2026-09-17.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice