DDT — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of DDT's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-09-04 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-06-05
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +34 | −20 | ~11 | 26 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +2 | −1 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-09-04
Retail sales increased 1.0% for the second quarter of 2026 compared to the prior year period, reflecting a somewhat resilient customer. Net income increased for the quarter, primarily driven by higher retail gross margin of 40.9%, which benefited from tariff refunds received during the period, and g…
For the second quarter of 2026, the Company reported net income of $97.7 million ($6.25 per share) compared to net income of $72.8 million ($4.66 per share) for the second quarter of 2025. Net income for the second quarter of 2026 includes $37.2 million ($28.4 million after tax, or $1.82 per share) …
Compared to the prior year second quarter, both total retail sales (which exclude construction sales) and comparable store sales increased 1%.
Retail gross margin increased to 40.9% of sales from 38.1% of sales reported in the prior year second quarter. Retail gross margin was positively impacted (260 basis points of sales) by the aforementioned $37.2 million IEEPA tariff refunds. Ending inventory increased 5% at August 1, 2026 compared to…
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended August 1, 2026 were $443.6 million (29.4% of sales) compared to $434.2 million (28.7% of sales) for the prior year second quarter. The increase of $9.4 million was primarily due to higher payroll and payroll-related expenses.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-06-05
The Company reported a good start to fiscal 2026, marked by a 3% comparable store sales growth for the first quarter supported by a strong, increased retail gross margin of 45.8% of sales.
For the three months ended May 2, 2026, the Company reported net income of $250.6 million ($16.04 per share) compared to net income of $163.8 million ($10.39 per share) for the three months ended May 3, 2025. Included in net income for the 13 weeks ended May 2, 2026 is a pre-tax gain on litigation s…
Compared to the prior year first quarter, both total retail sales (which exclude construction sales) and comparable store sales increased 3%. Retail gross margin increased to 45.8% of sales from 45.5% reported in the prior year first quarter. Ending inventory increased 3% at May 2, 2026 compared to …
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended May 2, 2026 were $444.0 million (28.3% of sales) compared to $421.7 million (27.6% of sales) for the prior year first quarter. The increase of $22.3 million was largely due to higher payroll and payroll-related expenses.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $364.0 million for the three months ended May 2, 2026 compared to $232.6 million for the prior year first quarter.
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-09-04
(a) The information set forth under Part II, Item 2(a), Unregistered Shares of Equity Securities, is incorporated by reference herein.
(c) During the three months ended August 1, 2026, none of the Company’s directors or officers (as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) adopted or terminated a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement or non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement (as such terms are defined in Item 408 …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-06-05
(c) During the three months ended May 2, 2026, none of the Company’s directors or officers (as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) adopted or terminated a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement or non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement (as such terms are defined in Item 408 of …
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice