DUKB — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of DUKB's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-05 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-07
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +131 | −212 | ~9 | 19 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +2 | −2 | ~1 | 2 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | 0 | −8 | ~1 | 0 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-05
Executing on Strategic Transactions. Our service territories continue to experience accelerating investment opportunities driven by a deepening economic development pipeline and significant customer growth. In March, we closed on two previously announced strategic transactions to efficiently fund th…
Constructive Regulatory and Legislative Outcomes. During the three months ended March 31, 2026, we continued to move our regulatory strategy forward and execute on investments for building a smarter energy future while maintaining our focus on safety and operational excellence, our customers, growth…
•During the first quarter, revised base rates went into effect for several of our jurisdictions including both Duke Energy Carolinas' and Duke Energy Progress' South Carolina service territories, as well as Duke Energy Kentucky's natural gas business. In March, Duke Energy Progress filed its first r…
•Duke Energy Carolinas received CECPCN approval from the PSCSC for a new CC unit in Anderson County, South Carolina. This advanced natural gas plant, along with our planned CTs and other CCs, will provide critical generation as we continue to modernize our energy infrastructure in the coming years. …
•Our nuclear sites continue to serve customers by safely producing clean, reliable and low-cost electricity, as well as providing economic benefits for our local communities, such as thousands of well-paying jobs and significant tax benefits. In February, we announced that our nuclear fleet achieved…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-07
Acting on Investment Opportunities. We operate in some of the most attractive jurisdictions in the country and the affordable, reliable power we provide continues to play a key role in bringing business and job growth to our region. Our service territories continue to experience accelerating investm…
In August 2025, we entered into an investment agreement to receive $6 billion in exchange for a 19.7% indirect investment in Duke Energy Florida. Subject to regulatory approvals, the transaction is expected to be completed through a series of closings starting in 2026 through mid-2028. In July 2025,…
Both of these transactions, along with our unwavering focus on operational excellence and value creation, demonstrate our continued ability to meet the unprecedented long-term growth anticipated across our service territories. See Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, "Dispositi…
Building a Smarter Energy Future. During the nine months ended September 30, 2025, we continued to move our regulatory strategy forward and execute on investments for building a smarter energy future while maintaining our focus on safety and operational excellence, our customers, growth of our busin…
•In January 2025, Piedmont and Duke Energy Indiana received constructive orders on their general rate cases from the NCUC and IURC, respectively. New rates were effective in November 2024 for Piedmont and late February 2025 for Duke Energy Indiana. New rates were also effective in January 2025 for D…
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-05
On December 4, 2024, the town of Carrboro, North Carolina, filed a lawsuit against Duke Energy in the North Carolina Superior Court, Orange County, alleging that Duke Energy and its predecessor companies knew since the late 1960s that fossil fuel emissions could cause global climate changes and enga…
In addition, the Duke Energy Registrants are, from time to time, parties to various lawsuits and regulatory proceedings in the ordinary course of their business. For information regarding legal proceedings, including regulatory and environmental matters, see Note 4, "Regulatory Matters," and Note 5,…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-07
In addition, the Duke Energy Registrants are, from time to time, parties to various lawsuits and regulatory proceedings in the ordinary course of their business. For information regarding legal proceedings, including regulatory and environmental matters, see Note 4, "Regulatory Matters," and Note 5,…
On December 4, 2024, the town of Carrboro, North Carolina, filed a lawsuit against Duke Energy in the North Carolina Superior Court, Orange County, alleging that Duke Energy and its predecessor companies knew since the late 1960s that fossil fuel emissions could cause global climate changes and enga…
Risk factors
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-07
Failure to complete strategic transactions could adversely affect the Duke Energy Registrants’ financial condition, credit profile and ability to execute their business strategy.
There can be no assurance that strategic transactions, including merger and acquisition activities and the disposition of assets or businesses, will be completed as expected or at all. These transactions are subject to various closing conditions, including regulatory approvals, and delays or failure…
•Inability to achieve anticipated proceeds could require Duke Energy to seek alternative funding sources to execute its capital plan and impede our ability to reduce debt or accomplish strategic initiatives;
•Adverse impacts to our credit metrics and potential pressure on our credit ratings;
•Negative reactions from financial markets and stakeholders, including reputational effects;
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice