EACO — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of EACO's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-07-09 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-04-13
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +5 | −7 | ~14 | 10 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 5 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-09
Interest and other (expense), net, decreased in the current period compared to the same period in the prior year, which was primarily due to interest expense from borrowings on the Company’s line of credit being slightly higher in the current year period.
The increase in revenues in the nine months ended May 31, 2026 as compared to the nine months ended May 31, 2025 was largely due to the expansion of our sales force headcount. The increase in revenues was also due to the development of better relationships with vendors and customers, and higher inve…
SG&A in the nine months ended May 31, 2026 increased from the same period in the prior year primarily due to higher employee payroll and benefit expenses and due to increased total employee headcount in the current period. SG&A also increased in the current period when compared to the same period in…
Cash provided by operating activities was $4,532,000 for the nine months ended May 31, 2026 as compared with cash provided by operating activities of $9,404,000 for the nine months ended May 31, 2025. Cash provided by operating activities in the current period was due to net income of $32,682,000 in…
The prior period cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to net income in the prior year period and an increase in trade accounts payable. Cash provided by operating activities in the prior year period was adversely impacted by increases in inventory and trade accounts receivable.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-13
Comparison of the Three Months Ended February 28, 2026 and 2025
Interest and other (expense), net, decreased in Q2 2026 compared to Q2 2025, which was primarily due to less interest expense from carrying a lower balance on the line of credit during Q2 2026 as compared to Q2 2025.
Comparison of the Six Months Ended February 28, 2026 and 2025
The increase in revenues in the six months ended February 28, 2026 as compared to the six months ended February 28, 2025 was largely due to the expansion of our sales force headcount. The increase in revenues was also due to the development of better relationships with vendors and customers, and hig…
SG&A in the six months ended February 28, 2026 increased from the same period in the prior year primarily due to higher employee payroll expenses and benefit expenses due to increased total employee headcount in the current period.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice