EAIQ — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of EAIQ's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-03 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-01
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +14 | −8 | ~8 | 10 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 6 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings, Risk factors, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-03
Total other expenses consisted of $1,069 and $2,127 of interest expenses and $0 and $7,999 in losses from disposal of subsidiary during the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
We recognized $55,800 and $18,500 in revenues during the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, from providing digital marketing services.
Operating expenses were $65,023 during the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $21,424 during the six months ended June 30, 2025. Operating expenses consisted of $35,707 and $4,400 in operating expenses such as contract labor related to the delivery of digital marketing services, $24,698 and…
Total other expenses consisted of $2,128 and $2,127 of interest expenses and $0 and $7,999 in losses from disposal of subsidiary during the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
As a result of the above, we recognized net loss of $11,351 and $13,050 for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-01
Total other expenses were $1,059 of interest expense during the three months ended March 31, 2026. There were no other expenses during the three months ended March 31, 2025.
Total assets were $15,903 and $10,127 at March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively, all current. Current assets consisted of $9,653 in cash and $6,250 in prepaid assets. Current assets as of December 31, 2025 totaled $10,127, consisting of $202 in cash, $9,300 in accounts receivable and pre…
Current liabilities totaled $37,195 and $50,462 as of as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively. Current liabilities consisted of accounts payable and accrued expenses totaling $17,714 and $30,981, respectively, and notes payable to related parties totaling $19,481 and $19,481, respec…
Non-current liabilities totaled $114,484 and $114,484 as of as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively. Non-current liabilities consisted of a notes payable of $114,484 and $114,400, respectively, and notes payable to related parties totaling $21,000 and $0, respectively.
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, our operating activities used net cash of $11,549. Uses of cash during the three months ended March 31, 2026 are mainly due to a $13,267 decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses, a $5,625 increase in prepaid assets and the $1,957 in net loss, pa…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice