EDBLWvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of EDBLW against SIC 0100 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| 기업 | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDBLW본 종목 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AGRZ | $6M#2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| CWBHF | — | — | — | — | 0.5%#3 | 0.4%#2 | -40.6%#4 | — | — | — | — | — |
| DOLE | $1.4B#1 | 31.8x#1 | 1.0x#1 | 0.1x#1 | 8.2%#2 | -59.1%#3 | 2.4%#1 | 3.7%#2 | 6.4%#1 | 5#1 | 4.2%#1 | 2.3%#1 |
| ESGH | — | — | — | — | -64.9%#4 | -306.1%#5 | -30.0%#3 | -23.7%#3 | -14.5%#3 | 4#3 | — | — |
| GNVR | — | — | — | — | — | -93.7%#4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GRUSF | — | — | — | — | 21.8%#1 | 120.2%#1 | -1.8%#2 | 19.2%#1 | -2.0%#2 | 5#1 | — | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 0100). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. 이 표는 생성 중 시간이 초과되어 그룹의 일부만 포함합니다. 순위는 표시된 행 내에서만 유효하며 곧 채워집니다. Table built 2026-08-04.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice