ENTG — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of ENTG's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-10-29 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-08-04
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +57 | −53 | ~39 | 36 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +1 | −1 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-10-29
Because of the global nature of our business, these trade developments have exposed, and may continue to expose, our business and operations to various risks, particularly supply chain-related risks. The imposition of tariffs and other trade measures (i) has increased, and may continue to increase, …
Our strategy has been, and will continue to be, to build a resilient supply chain and a global manufacturing footprint near our customers. While this strategy is intended to mitigate the financial and operational impact of these trade policies, our business has been, and we expect it will be continu…
The ongoing military conflict in the Middle East involving the U.S., Israel, Iran and other countries has caused uncertainty and volatility in the global markets, including, but not limited to, disruptions to shipping routes, oil and natural gas shortages, energy price fluctuations and availability …
As described in the table above, the increase in net sales was primarily attributable to a $205.8 million increase in net sales driven primarily by higher demand across both reporting segments, particularly for products supporting advanced logic and memory semiconductor production and the fabs being…
Sales increased year over year in all disclosed geographic regions as a result of stronger demand for our products, particularly for products supporting the advanced nodes, except in China, where sales were flat compared with the prior-year period.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-04
Because of the global nature of our business, these trade developments have exposed, and may continue to expose, our business and operations to various risks, particularly supply chain-related risks. The imposition of tariffs and other trade measures (i) has increased, and may continue to increase, …
costs for our customers and reduce demand for our products in those markets. Foreign governments have also imposed, and may further impose, export controls or licensing requirements on raw materials and inputs on which we rely, which could disrupt our supply chain or increase our costs. As a result,…
Our strategy has been, and will continue to be, to build a resilient supply chain and a global manufacturing footprint near our customers. While this strategy should mitigate the financial and operational impact of these trade policies, we expect that our business will be impacted, particularly in t…
The military conflict in the Middle East between the U.S., Israel, Iran and other countries has caused uncertainty and volatility in the global markets, including, but not limited to, disruptions to shipping routes, oil and natural gas shortages, energy price fluctuations and availability of certain…
As described in the table above, the increase in net sales was primarily attributable to a $97.8 million increase in sales primarily due to increased sales from both of our reporting segments, partially offset by a decrease of $7.0 million of sales attributable to unfavorable foreign currency transl…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-10-29
During the fiscal quarter ended September 26, 2026, no director or officer, as defined in Rule 16a-1 under the Exchange Act, adopted, modified or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or a “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” each as defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-04
On May 14, 2026, Olivier Blachier, our President, Materials Solutions and Senior Vice President, Chief Innovation Officer, entered into a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c) under the Exchange Act. Mr. Blachier’s plan provides for the sal…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice