EPAMvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of EPAM against SIC 7371 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| 기업 | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPAM본 종목 | $6.0B#2 | 15.9x#2 | 1.7x#2 | 1.1x#1 | 15.4%#1 | -16.9%#5 | 9.5%#2 | 10.7%#1 | 14.1%#1 | — | — | — |
| VRSN | $27.0B#1 | 47.8x#3 | — | 16.3x#3 | 6.4%#2 | 5.1%#2 | 67.7%#1 | — | — | — | — | 0.8%#1 |
| RGTI | $4.9B#3 | — | 9.2x#5 | 697.9x#6 | -34.3%#4 | -7.6%#3 | -1194.4%#4 | -40.2%#2 | — | 2#1 | — | — |
| RGTIW | $2.2B#4 | — | 4.0x#4 | 306.6x#5 | -34.3%#4 | -7.6%#3 | -1194.4%#4 | -40.2%#2 | — | 2#1 | -19.7%#1 | — |
| CYCU | $82M#5 | 1.5x#1 | 3.6x#3 | 5.4x#2 | -14.8%#3 | -2024.7%#6 | -154.7%#3 | -103.9%#5 | -109.0%#3 | — | — | — |
| CYN | $11M#6 | — | 0.2x#1 | 48.2x#4 | -40.5%#6 | 29.6%#1 | -11731.1%#6 | -52.6%#4 | -34.3%#2 | — | — | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 7371). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. 이 표는 생성 중 시간이 초과되어 그룹의 일부만 포함합니다. 순위는 표시된 행 내에서만 유효하며 곧 채워집니다. Table built 2026-09-17.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice