FACvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of FAC against SIC 3690 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| 기업 | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAC본 종목 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ENR | $1.4B#1 | 6.3x#1 | 7.1x#5 | 0.5x#2 | 2.3%#4 | 527.3%#1 | 14.8%#1 | 117.6%#1 | 11.1%#1 | 6#1 | — | 6.1%#1 |
| ENVX | $642M#2 | — | 3.1x#3 | 20.2x#6 | 37.9%#2 | 29.5%#3 | -557.0%#6 | -74.7%#5 | -25.0%#3 | 4#4 | — | — |
| FLNC | $473M#3 | — | 1.3x#2 | 0.2x#1 | -16.1%#6 | -312.7%#6 | -1.0%#3 | -12.9%#3 | — | — | 22.6%#1 | — |
| CHPT | $246M#4 | — | — | 0.6x#4 | -1.4%#5 | 20.5%#4 | -51.1%#4 | — | -199.2%#5 | 5#3 | -13.9%#2 | — |
| MVST | $226M#5 | — | 0.4x#1 | 0.5x#3 | 12.6%#3 | 85.1%#2 | 1.6%#2 | -5.4%#2 | 1.3%#2 | 6#1 | — | — |
| NEOV | $139M#6 | — | 6.3x#4 | 16.5x#5 | 218.6%#1 | -118.6%#5 | -56.0%#5 | -22.7%#4 | -37.9%#4 | — | — | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 3690). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. 이 표는 생성 중 시간이 초과되어 그룹의 일부만 포함합니다. 순위는 표시된 행 내에서만 유효하며 곧 채워집니다. Table built 2026-09-16.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice