FGBI — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of FGBI's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-13 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-17
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +83 | −134 | ~37 | 35 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | +1 | 0 | ~2 | 3 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +1 | −9 | ~1 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-13
•Net income (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 was $2.7 million and $(6.2) million, respectively, an increase of $8.9 million.
•Earnings (loss) per common share were $0.14 and $(0.54) for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. Total weighted average shares outstanding were 15,796,040 and 12,506,792 for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
•The allowance for credit losses was 2.00% of total loans at March 31, 2026 compared to 1.97% at December 31, 2025.
•Net interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was $20.7 million compared to $22.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025.
•The provision for credit losses for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was $2.6 million compared to $14.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-17
•Net (loss) income for the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 was $(45.0) million and $1.9 million respectively, a decrease of $46.9 million. Net (loss) income for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 was $(58.5) million and $11.4 million, respectively, a decrease of $69.9 m…
•First Guaranty has a $52.0 million credit exposure associated with commercial lease financing to entities related to an auto parts manufacturer that declared Chapter 11 bankruptcy during the third quarter. The credit exposure consists of one $17.2 million commercial lease, which was past due on its…
•First Guaranty recognized a one-time non-cash impairment charge to goodwill of $12.9 million. The impairment was the result of First Guaranty's stock price trading below book value and the recent increase in credit provisions. The impairment charge did not impact regulatory capital ratios.
•(Loss) earnings per common share were $(3.01) and $0.11 for the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Total weighted average shares outstanding were 15,122,702 and 12,504,717 for the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. (Loss) earnings per common sha…
•Net interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2025 was $22.2 million compared to $22.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2024. Net interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 was $66.7 million compared to $65.9 million for the nine months ended Septemb…
Market risk (Item 3)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-13
Cumulative gap as a percent of earning assets(0.2)%(6.9)%(6.9)%
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-13
Management, with the participation of the CEO and CFO, have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the disclosure controls and proce…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-17
A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
Notwithstanding the below identified material weakness, and notwithstanding the conclusion by our CEO and CFO that our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2025 were not effective, management believes the consolidated financial statements as included in this Quarterly Report on For…
Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
As of June 30, 2025, management determined that the Company did not effectively perform controls on a timely basis relating to the loan operations quality control review function for all new loans originated during the period. Management communicated the results of its assessment to the Audit Commit…
To address the identified material weakness described above, management implemented the following remediation steps:
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice