FICO — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of FICO's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-07-29 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-04-28
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +21 | −19 | ~42 | 21 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~5 | 2 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +1 | −2 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-29
•Cash flows from operating activities were $777.9 million during the nine months ended June 30, 2026, compared with $555.1 million during the nine months ended June 30, 2025.
•In June 2026, we amended our credit agreement to provide for a $1.5 billion term loan, the proceeds of which were used to fund an accelerated share repurchase agreement (“ASR Agreement”).
•Total share repurchases during the quarter ended June 30, 2026 were $2.3 billion, compared with $511.3 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2025, and during the nine months ended June 30, 2026 were $3.1 billion, compared with $878.1 million during the nine months ended June 30, 2025. The quart…
Cost of revenues remained consistent quarter-over-prior year quarter. Cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues decreased to 13% during the quarter ended June 30, 2026 from 16% during the quarter ended June 30, 2025, primarily due to increased sales of our higher-margin Scores products.
The quarter-over-prior year quarter increase in interest expense, net of $27.0 million was primarily attributable to a higher average outstanding debt balance during the quarter ended June 30, 2026. The higher average debt balance was primarily attributable to the $1.5 billion of 2025 Senior Notes (…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-28
•Diluted EPS was $11.14 during the quarter ended March 31, 2026, a 69% increase from the quarter ended March 31, 2025, and $17.73 during the six months ended March 31, 2026, a 39% increase from the six months ended March 31, 2025.
•Cash flows from operating activities were $397.4 million during the six months ended March 31, 2026, compared with $268.9 million during the six months ended March 31, 2025.
•We issued $1.0 billion of senior notes during March 2026, and used the net proceeds to make a payment against the revolving line of credit and repay the $400 million of senior notes due in May 2026. Total debt balance was $3.6 billion as of March 31, 2026, compared with $3.1 billion as of September…
•Total share repurchases during the quarter ended March 31, 2026 were $611.3 million, compared with $207.0 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2025, and during the six months ended March 31, 2026 were $773.9 million, compared with $366.8 million during the six months ended March 31, 2025.
The quarter-over-prior year quarter increase in cost of revenues of $3.6 million was primarily attributable to a $3.0 million increase in infrastructure and facilities costs and a $0.6 million increase in personnel, labor and other costs. The increase in infrastructure and facilities costs was prima…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-29
During the quarter ended June 30, 2026, none of our directors or officers (as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) of the Exchange Act) adopted, modified or terminated any contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of our securities that was intended to satisfy the affirmative defense condit…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-28
On March 19, 2026, Eva Manolis, a member of our Board of Directors, entered into a pre-arranged trading plan that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c) of the Exchange Act. This plan provides for the sale of up to 1,934 shares of our common stock and terminates on the earl…
On March 26, 2026, William Lansing, our Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board of Directors, terminated the pre-arranged trading plan that he had entered into on November 20, 2025 and that was intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c) of the Exchange Act. This plan pro…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice