FLUX — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of FLUX's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-07 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-02-12
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +15 | −13 | ~30 | 19 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~10 | 5 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +1 | −2 | ~6 | 7 |
| Risk factors | Some risk factors updated | +9 | −5 | ~1 | 0 |
| Other information | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
While we have experienced lower sales in the first nine months of fiscal 2026, we have not experienced a substantial difference in our year-over-year net loss, attributable primarily to two factors. First, management anticipated the potential global economic effects and the consequent business impac…
We have seen improvements in our sourcing and purchasing activity, reflecting our efforts to expand and optimize our vendor strategy. Additional improvements include more secondary sources to minimize stock-outs, lower costs from increasing sources, and controlled delivery times, as reflected in our…
Since January 2025, the U.S. government has increased certain existing import tariffs and implemented new import tariffs across a wide range of countries at various rates, including on product imports from almost all countries, and individualized higher tariffs on certain countries, notably China. S…
Revenues for the quarter ended March 31, 2026 were $6,588,000 compared to $16,742,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2025. The decrease of $10,154,000, or 61%, was driven by our largest customer within material handling significantly cutting their capital expense budget, an increasing number of com…
Cost of sales for the quarter ended March 31, 2026 was $4,788,000, or 73% of revenues, compared to $11,455,000, or 68% of revenues, for the quarter ended March 31, 2025. The increase in cost of sales as a percent of revenues was primarily due to an increase in E&O reserve, a loss in operating levera…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-02-12
We have seen improvements in our sourcing and purchasing activity, reflecting our efforts to expand and optimize our vendor strategy. Additional improvements include more secondary sources to minimize stock-outs, lower costs from increasing sources, and controlled delivery times, as reflected in our…
Since January 2025, the U.S. government has increased certain existing import tariffs and implemented new import tariffs across a wide range of countries at various rates, including on product imports from almost all countries, and individualized higher tariffs on certain countries, notably China. S…
Revenues for the quarter ended December 31, 2025 were $14,121,000 compared to $16,830,000 for the quarter ended December 31, 2024. The decrease of $2,709,000, or 16%, was driven by a sales mix shift to lower-priced products and lower volume in the material handling market, partially offset by higher…
Cost of sales for the quarter ended December 31, 2025 was 9,226,000, or 65% of revenues, compared to $11,367,000, or 68% of revenues, for the quarter ended December 31, 2024. The decrease in cost of sales as a percent of revenues was primarily due to lower warranty related costs, which were slightly…
Revenues for the six months ended December 31, 2025 were $27,296,000 compared to $32,955,000 for the six months ended December 31, 2024. The decrease of $5,659,000, or 17%, was mainly attributed to lower volumes and a sales mix shift to lower priced models in material handling.
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
Final settlement is subject to, among other things, court approval of such agreement. If the settlement does not obtain approval, the parties agree that the settlement class will be decertified without prejudice, and that all the parties will revert to their pre-settlement positions.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-02-12
Final settlement is subject to, among other things, court approval of such agreement. If the settlement does not obtain approval, the parties agree that the settlement class will be decertified without prejudice, and that all the parties will revert to their pre-settlement positions.
It is not possible at this time to reasonably assess the final outcomes of these proceedings or reasonably to estimate the possible loss or range of loss with respect to these proceedings. The Company intends to vigorously defend against these claims.
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
Our independent registered public accounting firm has included an explanatory paragraph relating to our ability to continue as a going concern in its report on our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. Our audited financial s…
Management has evaluated the Company’s expected cash requirements, including investments in additional sales and marketing, research and development, capital expenditures and working capital requirements, and believes the Company’s existing cash, along with the forecasted gross margin, will not be s…
The report from our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended June 30, 2025 includes an explanatory paragraph stating that our current liquidity position and projected cash needs raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, along with management’s …
We will need to raise additional capital or financing to continue to execute and expand our business.
We expect that our existing cash, additional funding which we believe is available under our GBC Credit Facility, and cash generated from our operations, will not be sufficient to meet our anticipated capital resources and to fund our planned operations for the next twelve months (see Liquidity and …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-02-12
In the past we have not been in compliance with the continued listing requirements for The Nasdaq Capital Market. If we fail to meet the continued listing requirements, our Common Stock may be delisted, which could affect the market price of our Common Stock, negatively impact stockholders’ ability …
On October 14, 2025, we received a notification (the “Notification”) from the Listing Qualifications Department (the “Staff”) of Nasdaq that we had regained compliance with Nasdaq’s continued listing rules because we met the requirement to have a market value of listed securities of at least $35,000…
As previously disclosed, on January 31, 2025 the Staff of Nasdaq notified us that we did not comply with the Stockholders’ Equity Requirement. On March 17, 2025, we filed our plan with Nasdaq to regain compliance with the Stockholders’ Equity Requirement, which included requesting an extension throu…
As of December 31, 2025, we also satisfy the Stockholder’s Equity Requirement, however, we can provide no assurances that we will be able to continue to comply with either the Market Equity Requirement or the Stockholder’s Equity Requirement. If we fail to comply with the Nasdaq continued listing re…
There can be no assurance that our common stock will continue to trade on Nasdaq or trade on the over-the counter markets or any public market in the future. In the event our common stock is delisted, our stock price and market liquidity of our common stock will be adversely affected which will impa…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice