FORR — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of FORR's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-08
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +26 | −18 | ~17 | 21 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Risk factors | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
business will consist of content marketing consulting and advisory. We anticipate that, on a year over year basis, our 2026 consulting revenues will decline in the low 20 percent range due primarily to the cessation of strategy consulting in 2026.
Events revenues decreased 17% and 18% during the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, respectively, compared to the prior year periods. The decrease in revenues during the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 was due to a decrease in sponsorship revenues as well as a decrease in event ticke…
Cost of services and fulfillment expenses decreased 12% during the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the prior year period. The decrease was primarily due (1) a $1.9 million decrease in event costs due primarily to the reformatting of certain of our events to smaller regional venues, (2) …
Cost of services and fulfillment expenses decreased 8% during the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the prior year period. The decrease was primarily due (1) a $1.9 million decrease in event costs due primarily to the reformatting of certain of our events to smaller regional venues, (2) a $…
Selling and marketing expenses decreased 7% during the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the prior year period. The decrease was primarily due to (1) a $1.4 million decrease in compensation and benefits costs due to a decrease in headcount and commissions expense and (2) a $0.5 million de…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
Events revenues were insignificant during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 as no events were held during either period.
Cost of services and fulfillment expenses decreased 2% during the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the prior year period. The decrease was primarily due to a $1.1 million decrease in facilities costs primarily due to a decrease in lease expense.
Selling and marketing expenses decreased 3% during the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the prior year period. The decrease was primarily due to a $0.9 million decrease in facilities costs primarily due to a decrease in lease expense.
General and administrative expenses increased 10% during the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the prior year period. The increase was primarily due to a $1.4 million increase in professional services.
The fluctuation for depreciation expense was immaterial during the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the prior year period.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice