FRPT — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of FRPT's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-05 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-06
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +27 | −10 | ~31 | 61 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 4 |
| Controls & procedures | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
Amount% of Net SalesAmount% of Net SalesAmount% of Net SalesAmount% of Net Sales
Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2025
Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2025
The following table sets forth net sales by class of retailer:
Net sales increased $75.3 million, or 14.3%, to $603.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to $527.9 million in the same period in the prior year. The $75.3 million increase in net sales was driven by growth in the Grocery, Mass, International, and Digital channel of $39.3 mil…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2025
(a)Includes true-ups to share-based compensation expense. We have certain outstanding share-based awards with performance-based vesting conditions that require the achievement of certain Adjusted EBITDA margins, Adjusted EBITDA and/or Net Sales targets as a condition of vesting. At each reporting pe…
performance conditions changes, the compensation cost previously recorded is adjusted as needed. When such performance conditions are deemed to be improbable of achievement, the compensation cost previously recorded is reversed.
Additionally, our cash flow generation ability is subject to general economic factors at the international, national and regional levels, including but not limited to increased interest rates and inflation, tariffs, trade wars, geopolitical conflict, war, recession, financial, competitive, legislati…
•a $2.1 million increase due to changes in operating assets and liabilities. The increase was primarily due to the change in accrued expenses and prepaid expenses and other current assets, partially offset by the changes in accounts receivable, inventories, other assets, accounts payable, and operat…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice