FUBO — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of FUBO's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-05 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-06
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +1 | 0 | ~36 | 64 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +2 | 0 | ~2 | 6 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | +2 | −3 | ~9 | 298 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +3 | −6 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
During the three months ended June 30, 2026, the Company determined that there were no triggering events that would require the Company to perform an interim impairment analysis.
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
On July 1, 2026, Adeia Media Holdings Inc (“Adeia”) filed a complaint against the Company in the District of Delaware alleging that the Company infringes four of Adeia’s patents in connection with the Company’s streaming services, and seeking damages and injunctive relief. On July 20, 2026, Adeia an…
The Company believes it has meritorious defenses and intends to defend itself vigorously in this matter.
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
In the United States, there has been uncertainty regarding the applicable regulations that will apply to the development and use of AI technologies. In the absence of federal AI legislation, states have filled the void by enacting laws regulating different aspects of AI technologies. For example, Ca…
Numerous other states have enacted, passed, or are considering AI-focused legislation, creating a patchwork of regulations and a complex compliance challenge. However, the durability of these laws and the potential of additional state-level legislative activity is uncertain following President Trump…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
In the United States, there has been uncertainty regarding the applicable regulations that will apply to the development and use of AI technologies. For instance, in January 2025, the current administration rescinded an executive order from the prior administration relating to the safe and secure de…
U.S. legislation related to AI technologies has also been introduced at the federal level and is advancing at the state level. For example, the California Privacy Protection Agency recently finalized regulations under the California Consumer Privacy Act, as amended by the California Privacy Rights A…
•the approval of Hulu is required to remove any director designated by Hulu in accordance with the Certificate of Incorporation.
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
(a) On August 4, 2026, the Company and Alberto Horihuela, the Company’s Chief Operating Officer, entered into a transition agreement (the “Transition Agreement”). Under the Transition Agreement, Mr. Horihuela will continue to serve as the Company’s Chief Operating Officer through November 30, 2026. …
Mr. Horihuela’s base salary and target bonus will remain unchanged through the Transition Date, at which time his base salary will be reduced to $173,581 and he will cease to be eligible for an annual bonus for any period of employment after that date. In consideration of his continued services as F…
(c) On June 15, 2026, John Janedis, the Company's Chief Financial Officer, adopted a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c) for the sale of up to 25,088 shares of the Company’s common stock until December 31, 2026.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
On April 29, 2026, the Company’s board of directors established July 28, 2026 as the date of the Company’s 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2026 Annual Meeting”), which will be held virtually. The time and website address for the 2026 Annual Meeting will be set forth in the Company’s defini…
As the 2026 Annual Meeting is being held more than 30 days after the first anniversary of the Company’s 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, held on June 17, 2025, the Company is hereby providing notice of the below revised deadlines for qualified stockholder proposals and stockholder nominations pu…
Stockholder proposals and director nominations brought under the Company’s Bylaws, which would not be included in the Company’s proxy materials for the 2026 Annual Meeting, must comply with advance notice provisions set forth in the Company’s Bylaws. For any proposed business or nomination to be con…
Any notice of proposed business or nomination must comply with the specific requirements set forth in the Bylaws or Rule 14a-8, as applicable. In addition to satisfying the above requirements, to comply with the universal proxy rules, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director…
On February 10, 2026, John Janedis, the Company's Chief Financial Officer, terminated a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement that was intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c) for the sale of up to 76,641 shares of the Company’s common stock until December 31, 2026.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice