GCTS.WTvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of GCTS.WT against SIC 3674 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| 기업 | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCTS.WT본 종목 | — | — | — | — | -68.6%#6 | -250.4%#4 | -1274.9%#6 | — | — | 3#3 | — | — |
| AOSL | $942M#5 | — | 1.2x#3 | 1.4x#2 | 5.9%#2 | -775.2%#6 | -4.1%#4 | -12.1%#5 | -4.2%#3 | 5#1 | — | — |
| ARM | $254.3B#1 | 243.9x#2 | 29.5x#5 | 51.7x#5 | 22.8%#1 | 14.1%#2 | 18.3%#1 | 10.5%#1 | — | — | — | — |
| CSIQ | $1.1B#4 | — | 0.4x#1 | 0.2x#1 | -6.6%#3 | -388.8%#5 | 0.8%#3 | -3.7%#3 | 1.2%#2 | 2#4 | — | — |
| DQ | $4.7B#2 | — | 1.1x#2 | 7.0x#4 | -35.3%#5 | 50.6%#1 | -40.6%#5 | -3.9%#4 | -7.5%#4 | 5#1 | — | — |
| HIMX | $4.5B#3 | 159.6x#1 | 9.8x#4 | 6.5x#3 | -14.7%#4 | -45.1%#3 | 1.2%#2 | 6.1%#2 | 1.5%#1 | — | — | 0.9%#1 |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 3674). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. 이 표는 생성 중 시간이 초과되어 그룹의 일부만 포함합니다. 순위는 표시된 행 내에서만 유효하며 곧 채워집니다. Table built 2026-08-04.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice