GDYN — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of GDYN's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-10-30 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-07-30
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +13 | −14 | ~30 | 45 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~14 | 4 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +2 | −1 | ~1 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +2 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-10-30
Our total revenues grew by 9.7% and 6.8%, reaching $114.3 million and $326.6 million for the three and nine months of 2026, respectively, compared to $104.2 million and $305.7 million in the prior-year periods, primarily driven by our TMT vertical.
Retail contributed 27.2% and 26.8% of our total revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026, respectively. Revenues for the third quarter grew by $3.7 million, or 13.3%, reaching $31.1 million, compared to $27.4 million in the prior-year quarter. The growth was primarily driven b…
The Finance vertical contributed 22.5% and 22.9% of total revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026, respectively. Revenues remained relatively flat on a quarterly basis, reaching $25.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2026, compared to $25.6 million in the prio…
September 30, 2025. Strong demand from our banking and financial services customers was offset by the completion of engagements at certain insurance customers.
The Consumer Packaged Goods/Manufacturing (“CPG/Manufacturing”) accounted for 10.9% and 11.0% of total revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026, respectively. Revenues were flat at $12.5 million compared to the prior-year quarter. Growth from a leading wholesale food distribut…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-30
Our total revenues grew by 7.0% and 5.3%, reaching $108.2 million and $212.3 million for the three and six months of 2026, respectively.
Retail contributed 26.5% and 26.6% of our total revenues for three and six months ended June 30, 2026. Revenues reached $28.6 million for the second quarter and $56.4 million for the year-to-date period, versus $28.8 million and $60.0 million, respectively, in the prior year periods. Within this ver…
Finance revenues experienced decreases of 2.6% and 2.4%, reaching $24.7 million and $49.2 million, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $25.4 million and $50.4 million for the same periods in the prior year. Within this vertical strong demand from our banking and financial s…
The Consumer Packaged Goods/Manufacturing (“CPG”) accounted for 10.9% and 11.0% of total revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, respectively. Revenues in this vertical remained relatively flat on a quarterly basis reaching $11.8 million and $11.3 million for the three months ende…
•Healthcare and Pharma generated $2.1 million and $4.3 million of revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, representing 1.9% and 2.0% of total revenues, respectively. This compares to $2.6 million and $5.0 million, or 2.5% of total revenues in both periods of 2025.
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-10-30
timely basis, information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act and were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our man…
Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, confirmed there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended September 30, 2026, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-30
Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, confirmed there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended June 30, 2026, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our inte…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-10-30
On August 3, 2026, Leonard Livschitz, our Chief Executive Officer and a Director, adopted a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement providing for the sale from time to time of up to 994,787 shares of our common stock. The trading arrangement was intended to satisfy the affirmative defense under Rule 10b5-1(…
On August 26, 2026, Anil Doradla, our Chief Financial Officer, adopted a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement providing for the sale from time to time of up to 243,308 shares of our common stock. The trading arrangement was intended to satisfy the affirmative defense under Rule 10b5-1(c) under the Securi…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice