GEOS — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of GEOS's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-07 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-08
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +11 | −11 | ~12 | 29 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings, Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-07
Three and nine months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the three and nine months ended June 30, 2025
Consolidated revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2026, was $15.8 million, a decrease of $9.0 million, or 36.4%, from the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year. The decrease for the three months ended June 30, 2026 was primarily due to lower demand for our Hydroconn® cable and connect…
Consolidated gross profit for the three months ended June 30, 2026, was $0.5 million, compared to $7.5 million from the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year. The decrease for the three months ended June 30, 2026 was primarily due to the decrease in revenue and related gross profits from our…
Consolidated operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2026, were $10.6 million, a decrease of $1.2 million, or 9.8%, from the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year. The decrease for the three months ended June 30, 2026 was largely due to (i) a decrease personnel costs, (ii) age…
In June 2025, we sold our property located at 4318 Northfield Lane in Houston, Texas. The 17.3-acre property served as additional parking for our main campus and contained legacy structures used to support our manufacturing and warehousing operations. We recognized a gain on disposal of property of …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
We continue to maintain a strong balance sheet with no debt. Our current liquidity enables our ability to seek out business acquisitions and allows us to continue investments in capital assets and product research and development, which have historically driven revenue growth.
Three and six months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the three and six months ended March 31, 2025
Consolidated revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2026, was $19.7 million, an increase of $1.7 million, or 9.5%, from the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year. The increase for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was primarily due to higher revenue from our Energy Solutions segmen…
Consolidated gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2026, was $0.7 million, compared to $1.7 million from the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year. The decrease for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was primarily due to the decrease in revenue and related gross profits from o…
Consolidated operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2026, were $12.1 million, an increase of $0.1 million, or 0.7%, from the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year. Consolidated operating expenses for the six months ended March 31, 2026, were $25.1 million, an increase of $0.…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice