GNTOFvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of GNTOF against SIC 1000 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| 기업 | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNTOF본 종목 | — | — | — | — | — | 9.3%#3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| DYNR | — | — | — | — | 25.7%#2 | 144.8%#1 | 16.5%#1 | 170.2%#1 | 95.4%#1 | 7#1 | — | — |
| ENRT | — | — | — | — | — | 49.3%#2 | — | -868.0%#2 | — | — | — | — |
| ERO | $2.9B#2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FUST | — | — | — | — | -86.2%#3 | -602.9%#7 | -604.8%#2 | — | — | 1#2 | — | — |
| GRNL | — | — | — | — | — | -189.3%#6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GSM | $606M#3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| GSTX | — | — | — | — | — | -25.1%#4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| HBM | $9.3B#1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| HNOI | — | — | — | — | 1445.9%#1 | -98.2%#5 | -10090.6%#3 | — | — | — | — | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 1000). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. 이 표는 생성 중 시간이 초과되어 그룹의 일부만 포함합니다. 순위는 표시된 행 내에서만 유효하며 곧 채워집니다. Table built 2026-08-04.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice