GO — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of GO's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-12 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-13
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +28 | −26 | ~25 | 40 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 2 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-12
Opportunistic Product. We continue working to increase opportunistic product levels to what we believe is necessary to improve the perception of our value leadership and drive sales. As of the second quarter of fiscal 2026, comparable sales from opportunistic product has improved relative to the fir…
We estimate that we will incur between $15 million and $24 million in net total restructuring charges in fiscal 2026 and fiscal 2027 related to the Optimization Plan, and we expect these actions to be substantially completed by the first quarter of fiscal 2027. We incurred bad debt expense of approx…
During the first half of fiscal 2026, we closed all 36 Closure Stores, and we substantially completed the Operator Agreement Terminations. In addition, we negotiated lease terminations with the landlords for certain of the Lease Exits and wrote-off the right-of-use assets and lease liabilities assoc…
•Comparable store sales declined by 0.3%, driven by a 2.1% decrease in average transaction size, partially offset by a 1.8% increase in the number of transactions.
•Gross margin was 30.2%, compared to 30.6% in the second quarter of fiscal 2025, a decline of 40 basis points.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-13
Opportunistic Product. We are working to increase opportunistic product levels to what we believe is necessary to improve the perception of our value leadership and drive sales. As part of these efforts we have invested and plan to continue to invest in additional promotional activity in the near te…
Following the Board adoption of the Optimization Plan, during the first quarter of fiscal 2026, we closed 27 stores and initiated the closure process at the remaining 9 stores associated with the Lease Exits. In the second quarter of fiscal 2026, we completed the closure of the remaining 9 stores. D…
We estimate that we will incur between $20 million and $27 million in net total restructuring charges in fiscal 2026 and fiscal 2027 related to the Optimization Plan, and we expect these actions to be substantially completed by the first quarter of fiscal 2027. Estimated restructuring charges expect…
•Net sales increased 3.6% to $1.17 billion from $1.13 billion in the first quarter of fiscal 2025.
•Comparable store sales declined by 1.0%, driven by 3.1% decrease in average transaction size, partially offset by a 2.1% increase in the number of transactions.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice