HLEO — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of HLEO's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-09-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-06-15
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +4 | −4 | ~29 | 43 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 5 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Legal proceedings, Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-09-14
Revenue for the three months ended July 31, 2026 decreased by 25% to $590,626 from $784,587 for the three months ended July 31, 2025, reflecting a lower overall volume of work compared to the prior three months. Contributing factors include continuing budget cuts to NASA programs enacted by the curr…
Overall operating expenses decreased by $188,960, or 19%, to $811,324 for the three months ended July 31, 2026, as compared to $1,000,284 for the three months ended July 31, 2025, in both cases driven by lower personnel expenses and G&A expenses.
As of July 31, 2026, the Company was not in default under any of its outstanding promissory notes.
Subsequent to July 31, 2026, the Company executed a note payable agreement for $165,000 from which $38,050 in fees were deducted for net proceeds of $126,950.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-06-15
Revenue for the three months ended April 30, 2026 decreased by 61% to $457,316 from $1,172,260 for the three months ended April 30, 2025, reflecting a lower overall volume of work compared to the prior three months. Contributing factors include continuing budget cuts to NASA programs enacted by the …
Overall operating expenses decreased by $136,552, or 12%, to $978,422 for the three months ended April 30, 2026, as compared to $1,114,974 for the three months ended April 30, 2025, in both cases driven by lower G&A expenses. Additionally, the Company issued stock for services to the CFO and consult…
As of April 30, 2026, the Company was in default under certain of its outstanding promissory notes with an aggregate principal amount of approximately $1,185,000. Subsequent to April 30, 2026, the Company has resolved all of these defaults. Specifically, pursuant to a settlement agreement dated Apri…
Subsequent to April 30, 2026, the Company raised an additional $284,800 in proceeds in exchange for 149,409 shares of common stock in connection with the April 2026 Private Placement Memorandum. On May 29, 2026, an accredited investor purchased a Convertible Preferred share, netting Helio Corporatio…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice