HTFC — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of HTFC's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-04 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-05
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +81 | −33 | ~35 | 73 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 4 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +1 | −1 | 0 | 0 |
| Risk factors | Some risk factors updated | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 2 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +2 | −1 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-04
our ability to fund unfunded commitments, including those of a new joint venture, RoHo Capital Opportunity Fund LLC f/k/a HRZN CRFH LLC (the “RoHo Joint Venture”) formed by us and CR Financial Holdings, Inc. (“CRFH”), to the extent approved by each member of the RoHo Joint Venture.
On April 14, 2026, the Company completed its previously announced merger with Monroe Capital Corporation (“MRCC”), HMMS, Inc. (“Merger Sub”), Monroe Capital BDC Advisors, LLC, and the Advisor, pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 7, 2025 (the “Merger Agreement”) (the “Mer…
We use an internal credit rating system to assess the credit risk of each debt investment in our portfolio. Our internal credit rating system is not a national credit rating system and is not intended to be comparable to ratings issued by any nationally recognized statistical rating organization. Se…
Effective June 30, 2026, we changed our internal credit rating scale to adopt the scale used by our affiliate Monroe Capital LLC, and its affiliates. We made this change in order to improve consistency and efficiency in portfolio risk assessment by the affiliated entities, with whom we have made, an…
Credit rating information for periods prior to June 30, 2026, as originally reported on the prior 4-to-1 scale can be found in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 and in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for periods ending prior to June 30, 2026.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-05
On April 14, 2026, the Company completed its previously announced merger with Monroe Capital Corporation (“MRCC”), HMMS, Inc. (“Merger Sub”), Monroe Capital BDC Advisors, LLC, and the Advisor, pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 7, 2025 (the “Merger Agreement”). Pursuant…
We use an internal credit rating system which rates each debt investment on a scale of 4 to 1, with 4 being the highest credit quality rating and 3 being the rating for a standard level of risk. A rating of 2 represents an increased level of risk and, while no loss is currently anticipated for a 2‑r…
As of March 31, 2026, there were four debt investments with an internal credit rating of 1, with an aggregate cost of $33.1 million and an aggregate fair value of $24.3 million and there were four debt investments with an internal credit rating of 2, with an aggregate cost of $56.9 million and an ag…
Comparison of the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025
The following table shows consolidated results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025:
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-04
We are subject to certain legal proceedings, from time to time, in the ordinary course of business. From time to time, we and our investment adviser may, in the ordinary course of business, be named as defendants in litigation arising from our investments in our portfolio companies and may, as a res…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-05
We are not currently subject to any material legal proceedings, nor, to our knowledge, are any material legal proceeding threatened against us. From time to time, we may be a party to certain legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, including proceedings relating to the enforcement of o…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-04
On July 29, 2026, we amended the NYL Facility to, among other things, to (i) add a second class of notes and (ii) extend the legal final maturity date to June 2034. The total commitment amount of $250.0 million for the secured notes remains the same under the NYL Facility.
During the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2026, none of our directors or executive officers adopted or terminated any contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of our securities to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c) or any “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrang…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-05
During the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2026, none of our directors or executive officers adopted or terminated any contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of our securities to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c) or any “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arran…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice