INBX — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of INBX's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-14
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +38 | −61 | ~8 | 53 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 3 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
Our current clinical pipeline of therapeutic candidates includes ozekibart and INBRX-106, both of which utilize our multivalent formats where the precise valency can be optimized in a target-centric way to mediate what we believe to be the most appropriate agonist function:
* Currently being investigated in chondrosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, colorectal cancer, and certain other solid tumor types.
** Currently being investigated in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, or NSCLC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, or HNSCC, among others.
Ozekibart is a precisely engineered tetravalent death receptor 5, or DR5, agonist currently being evaluated in patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer, Ewing sarcoma, chondrosarcoma, and certain other solid tumor types.
In April 2026, we announced interim data from the Phase 1/2 study evaluating ozekibart in combination with FOLFIRI in patients with locally advanced or metastatic, unresectable colorectal cancer, or CRC. Efficacy was assessed in 45 evaluable patients as of April 10, 2026, the cutoff date, and result…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-14
On May 29, 2024, Inhibrx, Inc., or the Former Parent, effected the spin-off of INBRX-101, an optimized, recombinant alpha-1 antitrypsin, or AAT, augmentation therapy in a registrational trial for the treatment of patients with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, upon which the Former Parent completed a …
On May 30, 2024, the Former Parent completed the merger, or the Merger, of Art Acquisition Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Aventis Inc., or the Acquirer, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sanofi S.A., or Sanofi, with and into the Former Parent with the Former Parent continuing as the surviving en…
For periods prior to the spin-off, descriptions of historical business activities are presented as if the spin-off had already occurred, and the Former Parent’s activities related to such assets and liabilities had been performed by us. Refer to Note 1 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financi…
Our current clinical pipeline of therapeutic candidates includes ozekibart (INBRX-109) and INBRX-106, both of which utilize our multivalent formats where the precise valency can be optimized in a target-centric way to mediate what we believe to be the most appropriate agonist function:
* Currently being investigated in chondrosarcoma, colorectal cancer, Ewing sarcoma, and certain other solid tumor types.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice