KLNG — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of KLNG's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-15 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-14
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +12 | −18 | ~12 | 11 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 1 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Legal proceedings, Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
The first quarter of 2026 marked a period of record bidding activity for subsea tie-back and maintenance projects. During the quarter, we secured significant contract awards from legacy customers in the Gulf of America and announced a major West Africa contract for installation and pre-commissioning…
The 56% increase in revenues was primarily driven by a $2,801 increase in lump-sum projects, with an additional $123 contribution from time-and-materials work. Revenues from new customers contributed $2,110 to the increase, while legacy customers accounted for the remaining $814, as compared to reve…
Cost of sales increased 55% from the first quarter of 2025 to the first quarter of 2026, generally consistent with higher revenue activity. The rate of increase was slightly below revenue growth, resulting in an improvement in gross profit margins to 32% of sales, up from 31% in the prior year perio…
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $611 in the first quarter of 2026 compared to the first quarter of 2025. The increase was primarily driven by higher administrative headcount, resulting in a $405 increase in personnel costs, as well as a $156 increase in audit fees and $50 o…
Management evaluates Company performance based on a measure that is not in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”), which consists of earnings (net income or loss) available to common stockholders before net interest income, income taxes, …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-14
Order intake for subsea tie-back and maintenance projects has increased significantly since the beginning of the year. During this period, we have made a deliberate investment in expanding our team to support our long-term growth strategy. We remain disciplined in balancing profitability with invest…
The 22% increase in revenues was primarily driven by both growth in fixed price contract sales for the manufacture of flying leads and hydraulic distribution manifolds and by an increase in the sales and delivery of service contract work when compared to revenues for the three months ended September…
The decline in gross profit was driven by a lower-margin product mix and an increase in direct overhead costs including employee benefits and rent expense for the Brazilian office when compared to the three months ended September 30, 2024.
The increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) was due to bad debt expense from the write-off of the OMSi receivable, higher administrative payroll due to increased hiring of key business support functions, and legal fees related to patents, master service agreements, and gen…
The increase in other (income), net was driven by an additional $83 gain recognized from the successful resolution of the WW Champion lawsuit.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice