LCGMFvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of LCGMF against SIC 1000 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| 기업 | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCGMF본 종목 | — | — | — | — | — | 192.4%#1 | — | 69.2%#1 | — | — | — | — |
| LAC | $1.0B#1 | — | 0.7x#1 | — | — | -102.3%#7 | — | -6.1%#2 | — | — | — | — |
| LAR | $940M#2 | — | 1.2x#2 | 194.2x#1 | 12.9%#4 | -395.3%#9 | — | -9.8%#3 | — | — | — | — |
| LBSR | — | — | — | — | — | -158.6%#8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| LTUM | — | — | — | — | — | 48.6%#4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| LZM | $329M#3 | — | 4.5x#3 | 311.4x#2 | 652.2%#1 | 70.6%#2 | -1742.2%#2 | -18.5%#4 | — | — | -26.0%#1 | — |
| LZM.WT | — | — | — | — | 652.2%#1 | 70.6%#2 | -1742.2%#2 | -18.5%#4 | — | — | — | — |
| MAGE | — | — | — | — | -73.8%#5 | 43.9%#5 | -866.3%#1 | — | — | — | — | — |
| MINR | — | — | — | — | 28.8%#3 | -31.8%#6 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 1000). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. 이 표는 생성 중 시간이 초과되어 그룹의 일부만 포함합니다. 순위는 표시된 행 내에서만 유효하며 곧 채워집니다. Table built 2026-09-19.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice