LEEEF — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of LEEEF's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-06
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +26 | −20 | ~9 | 14 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +1 | −2 | ~2 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Risk factors | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
Net loss and comprehensive loss attributable to the Company was $1,761,001 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to net loss and comprehensive loss of $2,667,423 for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The reduced net loss position for the period was primarily driven by the improvements i…
Beginning with the second quarter of 2026, the Company’s definition of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA was revised to exclude excise and other taxes from the income tax adjustment, and to present depreciation and amortization on the basis reported in the consolidated statements of cash flows. Prior perio…
Revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2026 was $7,274,908, a decrease of $1,416,748, or 16.3%, as compared to $8,691,656 for the three months ended June 30, 2025. Revenue declined year over year, reflecting ongoing pricing pressure within the California wholesale cannabis market.
Cost of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2026 was $4,864,545, a decrease of $2,337,090, or 32.5%, as compared to $7,201,635 for the three months ended June 30, 2025. Gross profit for the three months ended June 30, 2026 was $2,410,364, representing a gross margin of 33%, compared with a gro…
Total operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2026 were $4,398,720, an increase of $535,540, or 13.9%, compared to total operating expenses of $3,863,180 for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The increase in total operating expenses was attributable to the factors described below.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
Net loss and comprehensive loss attributable to the Company was $426,253 for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to net income and comprehensive income of $265,776 for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The swing to a net loss position for the quarter was primarily driven by a $390,4…
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities 390,405 (3,538,440)
Net income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss) attributable to shareholders of Leef Brands, Inc. $(426,253) -4% $265,776 3%
Revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was $9,377,002, a decrease of $21,259, or 0.2%, as compared to $9,398,261 for the three months ended March 31, 2025. Revenue was consistent year over year, reflecting the maturing of the Company’s strategic pivot to bulk concentrate manufacturing and…
Cost of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was $4,752,352, a decrease of $2,572,619, or 35.1%, as compared to $7,324,971 for the three months ended March 31, 2025. Gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was $4,624,650, representing a gross margin of 49%, compared with a …
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
The Company maintains “disclosure controls and procedures” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submit…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
The Company’s management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Ex…
In designing and evaluating the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure con…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice