LFSvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of LFS against SIC 8200 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| 기업 | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFS본 종목 | $56M#3 | 19.5x#1 | 4.8x#1 | 0.8x#1 | — | — | 5.3%#2 | 23.7%#1 | — | — | — | — |
| LXEH | — | — | — | — | -1.9%#2 | -416.7%#5 | -118.0%#7 | -83.4%#4 | -16.2%#2 | — | — | — |
| NAMI | $3.1B#1 | — | 256.3x#3 | 52.1x#3 | — | -586.0%#6 | -25.2%#4 | -112.5%#5 | -301.3%#3 | — | — | — |
| NRDY | $1.1B#2 | — | 65.0x#2 | 6.3x#2 | -5.9%#3 | 6.3%#2 | -34.6%#5 | -231.1%#6 | — | — | — | — |
| NWOEF | — | — | — | — | 13.6%#1 | 20.1%#1 | 8.7%#1 | 10.2%#2 | — | — | — | — |
| PCSV | — | — | — | — | -14.4%#4 | -73.3%#4 | 3.4%#3 | 3.3%#3 | 3.3%#1 | — | — | — |
| RMGL | — | — | — | — | -17.0%#5 | -0.0%#3 | -94.6%#6 | -233.2%#7 | — | — | — | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 8200). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. 이 표는 생성 중 시간이 초과되어 그룹의 일부만 포함합니다. 순위는 표시된 행 내에서만 유효하며 곧 채워집니다. Table built 2026-09-18.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice