LIDR — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of LIDR's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-14
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +22 | −8 | ~28 | 50 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 3 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 4 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Risk factors | Some risk factors updated | +25 | −1 | ~7 | 278 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
During the first half of 2026, we experienced increased commercial traction that we believe marks an inflection point in our transition from development toward commercialization. Revenue was $303 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, up 252% from $86 in the six months ended June 30, 2025.
During the second quarter of 2026, we partnered with MoveAWheeL to explore combining Apollo’s™ long-range 3D object detection with MoveAWheeL’s acoustic road-surface friction sensing, with the goal of providing real-time predictive road-surface friction data to improve advanced driver-assistance and…
In aerospace and defense, our customer engagements continued to increase during the second quarter of 2026, with multiple repeat orders from existing customers and active development across multiple programs. We are being evaluated for expanded use cases with these customers, and expect to receive a…
We believe the software-defined nature of our architecture has increasingly been a factor in customer evaluations and selections. Because Apollo™ and STRATOS™ are built on a common software-defined platform, customers can configure range, resolution, and field of view, and enable perception features…
The results of operations presented below should be reviewed in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes included elsewhere in this report. The following table sets forth our consolidated results of operations data for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
In aerospace and defense, our customer engagements continued to ramp during the first quarter of 2026, with multiple repeat orders from existing customers and active development across multiple programs with certain customers. We are evaluating expanded use cases for our products with these customer…
Comparison of the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025
The results of operations presented below should be reviewed in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes included elsewhere in this report. The following table sets forth our consolidated results of operations data for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 …
General and administrative expenses increased by $1,283, or 44%, to $4,178 for the three months ended March 31, 2026, from $2,895 for the three months ended March 31, 2025. This increase was primarily driven by a favorable adjustment of $1,685 upon settlement of a lease dispute during the three mont…
Net loss increased by $329, or 4%, to $8,345 for the three months ended March 31, 2026, from $8,016 for the three months ended March 31, 2025. This increase was primarily due to increased facilities costs as a result of the favorable adjustment from the settlement of a lease dispute in the prior yea…
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
We have begun to pursue, and expect to continue to pursue, opportunities in new and adjacent markets, in which we have limited or no prior experience. Entering new markets requires additional investment, subjects us to new risks and compliance requirements, and may not be successful.
Our growing defense and government-related business subjects us to procurement, compliance, and funding risks that differ from those applicable to our commercial business, including risks relating to government appropriations, terminations for convenience, and audits.
Our existing shelf registration statement expires in September 2026, and if our replacement shelf registration statement is not declared effective in a timely manner, or if we become subject to “baby shelf” limitations, our ability to access the capital markets and fund our operations could be mater…
Our ability to raise capital efficiently depends substantially on maintaining an effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3. Our existing shelf registration statement is scheduled to expire on September 26, 2026, upon the third anniversary of its effective date. On May 19, 2026, we filed a r…
Although we expect to request acceleration of the effective date of the replacement registration statement before our ability to use the existing registration statement lapses, we cannot assure you that the replacement registration statement will be declared effective on the timeline we anticipate, …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
In the recent past, we have been subject to the “baby shelf” rules and we may become subject to such rules again. In the event we again become subject to the “baby shelf” rules, it would limit our ability to raise additional capital to one-third of our public float in any twelve-month period.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice