LKNCYvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of LKNCY against SIC 5810 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| 기업 | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LKNCY본 종목 | $20.5B#1 | 39.9x#3 | 9.2x#3 | 2.9x#5 | 48.9%#1 | 27.9%#3 | 10.3%#3 | 23.0%#2 | 24.9%#1 | — | — | — |
| WEN | $1.4B#3 | 9.4x#1 | 12.1x#4 | 0.6x#1 | -3.1%#4 | -15.1%#4 | 15.8%#1 | 142.9%#1 | 9.7%#3 | — | -18.5%#2 | 9.3%#1 |
| SDOT | $181M#4 | — | — | 0.7x#3 | -64.8%#5 | -2439.4%#6 | -16.4%#6 | — | — | 2#1 | -92.6%#4 | — |
| BRCB | $140M#5 | — | 3.0x#2 | 0.7x#2 | 24.5%#3 | 99.2%#2 | 0.4%#5 | -0.1%#5 | 1.6%#4 | — | — | — |
| BROS | — | 103.1x#4 | — | — | 27.9%#2 | 126.5%#1 | 9.8%#4 | 11.5%#4 | 22.0%#2 | — | 11.3%#1 | — |
| CHA | $2.2B#2 | 12.9x#2 | 2.1x#1 | 1.2x#4 | — | — | 10.4%#2 | 16.0%#3 | — | — | -44.7%#3 | 8.2%#2 |
| FCCI | — | — | — | — | — | -98.9%#5 | -46.9%#7 | — | — | — | — | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 5810). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. 이 표는 생성 중 시간이 초과되어 그룹의 일부만 포함합니다. 순위는 표시된 행 내에서만 유효하며 곧 채워집니다. Table built 2026-08-01.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice