MQ — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of MQ's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-04 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-05
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +34 | −20 | ~11 | 46 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 5 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +1 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-04
Total platform services, net revenue increased by $20.5 million, or 14%, for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to the same period in 2025. The overall increase in platform services revenue was primarily driven by a 32% increase in TPV, partially offset by unfavorable shifts in our card …
Other services revenue increased by $5.1 million, or 70%, for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to the same period in 2025, primarily driven by higher card-related fulfillment, including card replacements and increased customer card shipments.
The increase in TPV was driven by strong performance across all our major use cases, particularly financial services, lending including buy-now-pay later, and expense management. TPV for our top five customers, based on their individual processing volumes in each respective period, increased 26%, in…
Costs of revenue increased by $7.8 million, or 17%, for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to the same period in 2025. This increase was primarily driven by higher Card Network and Issuing Bank fees associated with the increase in TPV. In addition, we recognized higher costs related to c…
As the increase in costs of revenue was outpaced by the net revenue growth discussed above, gross profit increased by $17.8 million, or 17%, while gross margin remained flat for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to the same period in 2025.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-05
Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 and 2025
Total platform services, net revenue increased by $24.4 million, or 18%, for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to the same period in 2025. The overall increase in platform services revenue was primarily driven by a 33% increase in TPV, partially offset by unfavorable shifts in our card…
Other services revenue increased by $2.4 million, or 33%, for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to the same period in 2025, primarily driven by professional services rendered for a certain network integration project that was completed in the first quarter of 2026.
The increase in TPV was driven by strong performance across all our major use cases, particularly financial services, lending including buy-now-pay later, and expense management. TPV for our top five customers, based on their individual processing volumes in each respective period, increased 25%, in…
Costs of revenue increased by $7.8 million, or 19%, for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to the same period in 2025. This increase was primarily driven by higher Card Network and Issuing Bank fees associated with the 33% increase in TPV.
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-04
*Reflects the Reverse Stock Split, which has been applied retrospectively. See Note 1, Business Overview and Basis of Presentation, in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional information.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice