MTCH — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of MTCH's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-11-03 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-08-05
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +84 | −77 | ~67 | 195 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +2 | −26 | 0 | 38 |
| Risk factors | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-11-03
BLK®, OurTime®, Upward®, HER™, The League®, Pairs™, Azar®, and other brands.
As of September 30, 2026, $700 million aggregate principal amount was outstanding.
Match Group, Inc., is leading the next chapter of human connection. Our global portfolio of brands
— including Tinder, Hinge, Match, Pairs, Upward, OurTime, The League, HER, Azar, and more — spark
meaningful real-world connections across cultures, communities, and every stage of life.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
Meetic®, OkCupid®, Plenty Of Fish®, Pairs™, Azar®, BLK®, Chispa™, The League®, Upward®,
The proceeds from the issuance of these notes were used to repay all of the outstanding 2026
Exchangeable Notes at their maturity or earlier, and the remaining proceeds were used for
general corporate purposes. As of June 30, 2026, $700 million aggregate principal amount
Match Group, Inc., through its portfolio companies, is a leading provider of digital technologies
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-11-03
July 9, 2026. On October 13, 2026, the DPC issued its final decision, imposing an €11 million fine. We
believe we have strong defenses to these claims and intend to appeal.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
Consumer Class Action Litigation Challenging Tinder’s Age-Tiered Pricing
On May 28, 2015, a putative state-wide class action was filed against Tinder in state court in
California. See Allan Candelore v. Tinder, Inc., No. BC583162 (Superior Court of California, County of
Los Angeles). The complaint principally alleges that Tinder violated California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act
by offering and charging users over a certain age a higher price than younger users for subscriptions to
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice