NCLH — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of NCLH's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-03 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-04
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +25 | −19 | ~34 | 85 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | +2 | −3 | ~3 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-03
The above examples are not exhaustive and new risks emerge from time to time. There may be additional risks that we currently consider immaterial or which are unknown. Such forward-looking statements are based on our current beliefs,
●2025 Exchangeable Notes. On July 21, 2020, pursuant to an indenture among NCLC, as issuer, NCLH, as guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, NCLC issued $450.0 million aggregate principal amount of exchangeable senior notes due 2025 (exchanged or repaid at maturity in 2025).
Non-GAAP diluted weighted-average shares are calculated using the treasury stock method to calculate the effect of restricted share units and options and the if-converted method to calculate the effect of convertible instruments. This is the same methodology that is used when calculating GAAP dilute…
The Company remains below its optimal booked position for the next 12 months, as it continues to experience pressure from softer demand at Norwegian Cruise Line related to Company-specific execution challenges, as well as the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. As we look ahead, the full amenities …
In July 2026, we entered into a memorandum of agreement for the sale of Oceania Sirena. The terms of the memorandum stipulate that the closing of the sale will take place during the three months ended September 30, 2026. In addition, a bareboat charter agreement is anticipated to be executed for Oce…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-04
The above examples are not exhaustive and new risks emerge from time to time. There may be additional risks that we currently consider immaterial or which are unknown. Such forward-looking statements are based on our current beliefs, assumptions, expectations, estimates and projections regarding our…
In 2025 and 2026, we drew down on euro-denominated debt for three newbuilds that is primarily unhedged, and we expect to take delivery of ships that have euro-denominated debt in the future. Due to the significant increase in our euro-denominated debt in 2025 and 2026 and the fact that a substantial…
The Company remains below its optimal booking range following certain execution missteps, exacerbated by softer demand related to heightened geopolitical uncertainty. Recent events related to the conflict in the Middle East have impacted bookings across all three brands, especially in Europe during …
marketing, with deployment and revenue management, with the benefits of these actions expected to materialize gradually over time.
Total cruise operating expense increased 5.7% primarily related to the delivery of new ships. Total other operating expense increased 15.7% in 2026 compared to 2025 primarily related to an increase in marketing, general and administrative expense from higher advertising and promotions and severance …
Market risk (Item 3)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-03
Our exposure to market risk for changes in fuel prices relates to the forecasted purchases of fuel on our ships. Fuel expense, as a percentage of our total cruise operating expense, was 13.8% and 10.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and was 13.1% and 12.0% for the s…
We estimate that a 10% increase in our weighted-average fuel price would increase our anticipated 2026 fuel expense by $39.7 million. This increase would be offset by an increase in the fair value of all our fuel swap agreements of $18.5 million. Fair value of our derivative contracts is derived usi…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-04
Our exposure to market risk for changes in fuel prices relates to the forecasted purchases of fuel on our ships. Fuel expense, as a percentage of our total cruise operating expense, was 12.3% and 13.4% for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. We use fuel derivative agreement…
fluctuations in fuel prices, and as of March 31, 2026, we had hedged approximately 51% and 28% of our remaining 2026 and 2027 projected metric tons of fuel purchases, respectively. As of December 31, 2025, we had hedged approximately 51% and 22% of our 2026 and 2027 projected metric tons of fuel pur…
We estimate that a 10% increase in our weighted-average fuel price would increase our anticipated 2026 fuel expense by $81.2 million. This increase would be offset by an increase in the fair value of all our fuel swap agreements of $38.9 million. Fair value of our derivative contracts is derived usi…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice