NDSNvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of NDSN against SIC 3569 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| 기업 | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDSN본 종목 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| RRX | $9.9B#1 | 30.7x#3 | 1.4x#2 | 1.7x#3 | -1.6%#4 | 42.5%#2 | 11.5%#2 | 4.0%#2 | 4.9%#2 | 7#1 | — | 0.9%#1 |
| ESAB | $4.1B#2 | 24.1x#2 | 1.6x#3 | 1.5x#2 | 3.7%#3 | -14.4%#4 | 14.5%#1 | 8.9%#1 | 6.9%#1 | 4#3 | — | 0.5%#2 |
| OUST | $2.4B#4 | — | 6.4x#4 | 14.1x#4 | 52.5%#2 | 37.8%#3 | -43.7%#3 | -16.3%#3 | — | 6#2 | — | — |
| CHRN | $2.6B#3 | — | 14.6x#5 | 36.8x#5 | -15.1%#5 | -330.3%#5 | -52.4%#4 | -28.0%#4 | -21.5%#3 | 4#3 | 353.1%#1 | — |
| KITTW | $97883#6 | 0.0x#1 | 0.0x#1 | 0.0x#1 | 191.8%#1 | 69.7%#1 | -449.8%#5 | -787.9%#5 | -69.5%#4 | — | — | — |
| ATS | $1.8B#5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 3569). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. 이 표는 생성 중 시간이 초과되어 그룹의 일부만 포함합니다. 순위는 표시된 행 내에서만 유효하며 곧 채워집니다. Table built 2026-09-16.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice