NIOvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of NIO against SIC 3711 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| 기업 | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIO본 종목 | $8.1B#3 | — | 13.6x#2 | 0.6x#3 | 38.9%#1 | 30.4%#4 | -16.0%#4 | -359.2%#4 | -226.3%#3 | — | — | — |
| HMC | $59.3B#1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| LAAOF | — | — | — | — | -18.8%#3 | -85.2%#5 | -0.5%#1 | 1.6%#1 | -1.8%#1 | — | — | — |
| LI | $22.8B#2 | 140.6x#1 | 2.2x#1 | 1.4x#4 | -18.8%#3 | -85.2%#5 | -0.5%#1 | 1.6%#1 | -1.8%#1 | — | — | — |
| LOT | $257M#4 | — | — | 0.5x#2 | -43.8%#5 | 58.0%#2 | -81.5%#5 | — | — | 4#1 | — | 0.7%#2 |
| LOTWW | $16M#5 | — | — | 0.0x#1 | -43.8%#5 | 58.0%#2 | -81.5%#5 | — | — | 4#1 | — | 11.5%#1 |
| NIU | — | — | — | — | 36.7%#2 | 78.7%#1 | -2.0%#3 | -4.4%#3 | — | — | -56.9%#1 | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 3711). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. 이 표는 생성 중 시간이 초과되어 그룹의 일부만 포함합니다. 순위는 표시된 행 내에서만 유효하며 곧 채워집니다. Table built 2026-11-02.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice